My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-14-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 09-14-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:55 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Arden Hi 11 s Council 4 August 31, 1992 . <br /> Jean Crimmins asked when construction would begin. Graham <br /> stated that the contractor had ini tiall y indicated the work <br /> would begin right after Labor Day, but that schedule has now <br /> been postponed for a couple of weeks. <br /> Attorney Filla commented that the purpose of tonight's <br /> meeting is to allow an exchange regarding previously <br /> registered objections and responses, and he assured that <br /> Council is aware and has considered all the previously heard <br /> comments on this lssue, He stated that he would be <br /> comfortable conducting the public hearing tonight, but if <br /> Counci 1 so desired, the meeting could be rescheduled to a <br /> specific date. <br /> Mayor Sather stated he would be amenable to postponing if <br /> residents desire. Councilmember Mahowald reminded that <br /> those in attendance this evening already know everyone's <br /> positions on this issue, and the issue has already been <br /> delayed. Councilmember Malone echoed Mahowald's comments <br /> and reiterated the fact that addi ti ona 1 objections will not <br /> be introduced this evening. Councilmember Growe stated she <br /> would accept postponing or moving the item to the end of <br /> this evening's agenda to allow residents adequate time to <br /> review the Summary and Response document, councilmember . <br /> Hicks stated that Council has been trying to resolve issues <br /> involving Keithson Pond for a very long time, and he does <br /> not appreciate innuendo that Council has lied to the public <br /> on this matter; he agreed to postpone if residents so desire <br /> after review of the material. Councilmember Mahowald <br /> concurred with Hicks and stated that Council has tried at <br /> length to resolve the Keithson Pond issue and is not likely <br /> to be receptive to negative comments made against council's <br /> intentions in this matter. <br /> Council agreed to recess for 15 minutes, then let the <br /> residents decide whether to postpone the hearing. The <br /> meeting recessed. <br /> Mayor Sather reconvened the public hearing at 8:15 p,m. and <br /> reminded residents that discussion would be limited to the <br /> previously registered object.ions and their responses. <br /> Attorney Filla asked to focus on each objection case by case <br /> as outlined in the July 27 Summary and Response document. <br /> Nelson Obiection - 4 'S_Q4 nh'"j tb.s 0.1'1--'. Ron Nelson complimented <br /> staff for their summary of Keithson Pond background. He <br /> asked if the estimated project costs reported this evening <br /> by Graham inel ude easement acquisition on the Reiling <br /> property. Attot'ney Filla reported that the Reiling property . <br /> needed for the pond is currently involved in condemnation; <br /> the project costs reported this everllng do not incl ude any <br /> Reiling property acquisition costs. Graham added that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.