My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-26-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 05-26-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:01 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />--- - ----------- <br /> ~ -" <br />Arden Hills Council 6 May 11, 1992 . <br />RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT, <br />ORDER PUBLIC HEARING AND <br />PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - <br />DUNLAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS <br />City Engineer Graham reported that the feasibility report <br />for Dunlap street was prepared using two options for road <br />improvement. One option would be cold-in-place recycling <br />(CIR) project which involves rejuvenating the existing <br />surface and overlaying with a 2" layer on top, at an <br />estimated cost of about $50,400. The second option would be <br />complete reconstruction of the road at an estimated cost of <br />$198,900. <br />Graham explained that CIR would not address poor soil <br />conditions identified in the Dunlap area, but he would still <br />recommend CIR in light of the fact that the property owners <br />in the area have expressed a need for a short-term solution <br />at a lower cost. Graham recommended a public hearing on the <br />1992 Dunlap improvement be held on June 8, 1992. <br />Councilmember Hicks asked if CIR would result in a road <br />adequate to handle the heavy vehicles which use the road. <br />Graham said that although he could not assure the tonnage . <br />limits of a CIR project, he would expect a 12 - IS-year life <br />from CIR. He said a complete reconstruction would provide <br />about a 20-year 1 ife, but at nearly four times the cost of <br />CIR. <br />Council had been given an opportunity to review the <br />feasibility report prior to the Council meeting. Graham <br />noted that page 9 of the report should have included <br />indication that CIR does not include soil corrections. <br />Council briefly discussed a potential assessment rate. <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adopt Resolution <br /> 92-32 Receiving the Feasibility Report and Ordering a <br /> Public Hearing, to be held at 8:30 p.m. June 8, 1992, <br /> on the Matter of 1992 Dunlap Street Improvements. <br /> Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt Resolution <br /> 92-33 Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications, <br /> for Cold-In-Place Recycling, in the Matter of the 1992 <br /> Dunlap street Improvement. Motion carried unanimously <br /> (4-0). <br />ORDER PUBLIC HEARING - ROUND <br />LAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENT . <br />City Engineer Graham reminded Council that action was taken <br />on Apri 1 13, 1992 to accept the feasibility report and order <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.