Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> Arden Hills council 2 July 13, 1992 <br />. c. Approve Pay Estimate #4 for 1991 North Snelling <br /> Avenue Improvements. <br /> d. Adopt Ordinance No, 289 Relating to Residential <br /> Recyc1 ing Fees. <br /> e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENT HEARING <br /> CONTINUED FROM JUNE 29, 1992 <br /> Mayor Sather joined the meeting at this time. <br /> Mayor Sather reopened the meeting at 7:33 p.m. for the <br /> purpose of continuing a public hearing on Keithson Pond <br /> Assessments, <br /> Engineer Maurer stated that information regarding Keithson <br /> Pond Assessments was provided at the June 29, 1992 Council <br /> meeting. <br />. Councilmember Mahowald asked if there is any new information <br /> regarding properties contributing to the Keithson drainage <br /> problem, Engineer Maurer stated that in reviewing the <br /> properties, MSA believes the information given at the June <br /> 29 meeting as to which properties contribute drainage and <br /> are thus subject to assessment is correct. He added that it <br /> has been determined that the townhomes in the area do not <br /> significantly contribute drainage. <br /> Councilmember Hicks asked if the alternative plan described <br /> in the engineer's July 8 memo, at a cost of $8,000 - <br /> $13,000, will adequately correct the existing drainage <br /> problem, Maurer said the plan would address the existing <br /> problem, and the design would provide for overflow to cross <br /> the Reiling property. He added that the development which <br /> has occurred in the Keithson addition would increase the <br /> runoff across the Reiling property, Further, this overland <br /> flow would have to be dealt with when the remaining Reiling <br /> property is developed. <br /> Councilmember Hicks questioned whether an easement would be <br /> necessary if the retention pond were designed properly. <br /> Attorney Filla said the Reiling property owner would argue <br /> that the City does not have the right to use his property <br />. without an easement. Councilmember Malone said the original <br /> intent was to drain across the Reiling property, but it is <br /> not known whether that would have worked. He added that it <br />