Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Arden Hills Council 6 July 13, 1992 . <br /> In response to Council questions, Bergly stated that one <br /> possible use of the newly created vacant parcel would be <br /> that CPI would purchase it for parking purposes. Parks <br /> Director Buckley stated that perhaps the City trail could <br /> then connect to CPI property. <br /> Mike Nordstrom, representing Grand Met/Alpo Pet Foods, said <br /> that condition 2 of the Planning Commission is that park <br /> dedication requirements be determined and either dedicated <br /> along with the division or paid prior to filing. He asked <br /> if it would be possible to wait until the newly created <br /> parcel is developed in order to allow input from a new <br /> owner. <br /> Attorney Filla stated that typically park dedication fees <br /> are imposed as part of a lot spli t. In order to accommodate <br /> Me Nordstrom's request, he suggested that before the City <br /> stamp the deed, it include notations as to the need to <br /> satisfy park dedication. <br /> MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to approve the minor <br /> subdivision/lot split, (Case 92-12) with the six <br /> conditions spelled out in the July 1, 1992 Planning . <br /> Commission minutes, condition 2 to read: <br /> "Park Dedication requirements are to be <br /> determined, and the deed for the newly created <br /> vacant parcel is to be stamped with a notation <br /> that park dedication requirements must be <br /> satisfied before issuance of a building permit. " <br /> Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> INTERIM USE AGREEMENT/SITE PLAN <br /> WHAT-A-RACQUET SPORTS CLUB <br /> Attorney Filla stated that rather than litigate this issue, <br /> he and Attorney Balyk, representing Dennis FosterjWhat-A- <br /> Racquet Sports Club, have discussed the possibility of <br /> entering into an interim use agreement which would allow Mr. <br /> Balyk's client to construct a tennis facility for a five <br /> year period. <br /> Council was provided a copy of the draft interim use <br /> agreement. Filla explained that the agreement allows for a <br /> three year extension at the end of the initial five years, <br /> provided the developer requests the extension 90 days prior <br /> to expiration of the initial five year period, and provides <br /> data or information in a form acceptable to the City which <br /> indicates that: . <br /> 1) The developer has made a good faith effort to obtain <br /> financing for a permanent structure but is unable to <br /> obtain such financing, and, <br />