Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> Arden Hills Council 4 December 1.4, 1 <;C12 <br /> Councilmember Malol18 commented that tlle City obtains access <br /> to park property via a portion of this property; he asked <br /> what kind of agreement is in place to allow this access. <br /> Jim Bellandi, Attorney for Control Data, explained there was <br /> a lease allowing access which has expired. Bellandi stat,ed <br /> that he has discussed this matter with City Attorney Filla <br /> and the intent i.3 1.0 l'ew)~it8 the e"pl.l"ed 18838 to continue ~ <br /> to allow City aLce~s; h~ 3ddeJ th12 is not a controversial ~ t <br /> . .~ ". ~ t' <br /> lS,;:.U"::; . " <br /> f', ( [ .,' <br /> Councilmember ~lalone as'~:ed if this property i~; locat,3d in an )1~v!: y~ (v <br /> . . . ~ ~, \.' <br /> 1-1 zone; Bel'gly answered that 11'. IS Ln an 1,-1 zone and he Ii. <br /> has been assur-2d th,::Jt zc;,niriO dt~signa.tion will T;.;:,rnain. V....J..l /.,t <br /> ,f I..I~ ''-"j'" <br /> /:'/'( t <br /> MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to approve Case #92- f:jil <br /> 21, Minor Subdivision/Lot Consolidation, Control Data " { <br /> with the conditions that: Y <br /> 1 ) The proposed division be prepared in the form of a <br /> final plat for City signatures and recording with <br /> the County, <br /> 2) Parcels A, 8, ancl C shall not include the rights- <br />. of-way of abutting streets either in the <br /> delineation on the plat or in the legal / <br /> descriptions, <br /> 3 ) The City Attor ney review and approve the plaf and <br /> any conveyance documents, <br /> 4 ) Rice Creek Watershed District review and approve <br /> wetlarld easementsl <br /> 5 ) Park dedication be resolved prior to de\lslopment <br /> of the pn)pe,' ty , <br /> 6 ) Utility and clralnage easements be outlined per the <br /> City Planner's recommendations. <br /> Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> Rf'y':J::::H.. .ANP.APPRO\lAbQF:J99}_i:ll/5JN:::'?? <br /> 1,.,I~E::t'$E:AND_pE::m1J T_EE::C: ...$I.Rllr::TI)RI~. <br /> Adrninist'r-Ctto, Per-son r\3c:allc~d that at the November 30 <br /> Council m,?E:ting ths Council received recommendations frorrl <br /> the Finance Committee ,-egardiI19 cllanges in licenSE? and <br /> permit. fees. Rc~ferr i fig to he,. December 10 report, she <br /> reported that staff l'la.s reviewed the recommendations of the <br /> Finance Committee and concurs with recommendations to changB <br /> the followi ng license and permit fees: <br /> 1 ) Increase 1n Sign license fees:; <br /> Initial pe,'mi.t f""e ~- fr om $;~5 to 'kiO r:C\'( 1-::"=:.',) <br /> ./ .' -.~' . <br /> Annual ~.ign lic.c'n~::;;':, fe;::;- 1(/) :::':q. ft. or less from ,!;10 <br />. to $20; 101. sq. ft. LG 40C; sq_ ft. fr()nl $2/additioflal tu <br /> 't4/addi t~ion.;:tl; (;'\i:2;: r 400 sq. ft. from $2.50/additional <br /> to $5/additi()n31. <br /> 2 ) Increase the drlve-.ttlrougt, rest.aurant fee from '$2':,0 to <br /> $300. <br /> - --..-------- <br />