CCP 11-09-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

p'..nnh>q o......iAAion Meetinq 5 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-19: DIVER OF H::'RM'CRItIM ClIDINAK:E: 2020 TBCM muvE. aml JUISM[JS8DI . 7. '!he proposed garage will help to reduce the 1-35 traffic noise impact on the Applicant's backyard. 8. The ern of the structure facing 'Ihcm Drive will be a fairly stan:lard garage width of 24 feet. '!he 40 foot depth will not be evident from 'Ihcm Drive. 9. A 30 ft. x 48 ft. (1440 sf) 21 ft. high steel pole l:uil~ is located on the lot ilmnediately west of the subject lot. For cc:mq:erison, the ptopose:i structure will be 24 ft. x 40 ft. (960 sf) and 10 ft. high on the eave line. 10. '!he roof of the structure will be the same color as the roof on the house, and the exterior walls will be lighter than the house b..rt in a similar color. Planner Bergly recommerxied the following action: '!hat the waiver of the Moratorium be approved to allow construction of a garage that would be allowed utrler the existing Ordinance for the reasons stated in the above fin:iings. winiecki requested the recording secretary incorporate into the record, the letter of objection received from Dana Souther, 2018 '!han Drive, dated November 3, 1992. Carol Fischer, co-owner of the property at 2020 'Ihan Drive resporrled to the letter from Souther by advising Conunission of several neighborhood disputes with this person. Fischer noted that the letter did not appear . to be objecting to the garage, b.rt objecting to the overall developnent of this site. Zonin;J Administrator advised Conunission that arv-<><:sory l:uil~ must be setback 10 feet fran the rear property line and 5 feet from the side property line in an R-2 district. She noted the plan showed the setbacks reversed and asked the Applicant if these requirements could be met for placement of the structure. OWen Rasmussen agreed to place the structure 10 feet fran both the rear and side property lines. Petersen moved, secorrled by Piotrowski, to recommerxi to Council approval of Case #92-19, Waiver of the Developnent Moratorium Ordinance to allow construction of a garage utrler the existing Ordinance based on the reasons outlined in the Planner's report dated 11/4/92. Motion passed. (4-1). (Petersen, Piotrowski, McGraw and Carlson voting in favor; winiecki opposed). Cl\SE #92-20. SIDE YARD SETBl\CK '\7J\RD\la: FCR IJiIEL:LIm EXPANSION. 1127 c5HMEIM AVENUE. RICK AND SHERIL'lN JIllNSClN Planner Bergly referred to his report of November 4, 1992, and explained the Applicant is requesting a variance from the required 10 foot side yard in the R-1 District to allow the dwelling to be expanded to be . within 6 feet of the lot line. A 4 foot side yard variance is therefore required .