My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-16-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 11-16-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:17 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ..-..-....-- ...__.._--.- -----.,..._-~...._-- . - .-..- -...-.... <br /> 6 <br /> . soil Conservation service method for evaluating run-off because <br /> it is considered fair and nationally accepted (see Appendix C). <br /> For this preliminary study, the calculations from Roseville were <br /> used as an estimate dUe to the city's proximity. These figures <br /> are given in the following table. <br /> Residential <br /> Standard 2" Equivalence <br /> Land Use Rain Runoff Factor <br /> Residential 0.24 1 <br /> Multiple Family 0.56 2.5 <br /> Commercial 1.24 5 <br /> Industrial , 1.24 5 <br /> Schools 0.30 1.25 <br /> churches/Govt. Bldg. 0.56 2.5 <br /> Parks 0.18 0.75 <br /> Cemeteries, Golf courses 0.09 0.25 <br /> ,- <br /> . <br /> The residential equivalence factor (REF) is defined as the ratio <br /> of the average volume of run-off generated by one acre of a given <br /> land use zone to the average run-off generated by one acre of <br /> typical single .familr residential land, during a standard one <br /> year rainfall event. The REF values in the preceding table were <br /> then rounded to the nearest 0.25. <br /> 2. Determine the cost of needs which will be funded by this <br /> utility. <br /> An estimated amount required to finance the uses of the <br /> utility was computed. This was done by determining the quantity <br /> of undersized pipes in the system identified in 1984 Barr report <br /> and then estimating a replacement cost. See Appendix C for a <br /> detailed table of the estimation of undersized pipes. In the <br /> following table there is a breakdown of the funds required to <br /> finance the cost of the needs described on page 4. Currently, <br /> most of these needs are being funded by property taxes and/or <br /> assessments. Maintaining a storm water master plan and some of <br /> the reconstruction costs are presently not funded. These are new <br /> needs which the storm water utility fund could pay for. <br /> . <br /> No.937, city of Roseville <br /> ----- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.