My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-30-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 11-30-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:17 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, ' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I I <br /> <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />SAINT PAUL PIONEER PRESS <br /> <br /> <br />II,TH <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 1992 <br />WEDNESDAY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS <br />'" <br /> <br /> <br />'Mayor fails to see why voters <br />'defeated building referendum <br /> <br />BEN CHANCO STAFF WRITER' ~1II!l' said h~ still couldn't ~de':Stand why the ma- <br />. jonty of residents were agamst It. <br />T - "It's absolutely beyond me," he said. "If they had <br />. be mayor of Arden Hills did not see the defeat of taken -the time to come and look at the current <br />a $2.8 million bond referendum as an overwhe1miDg - facility and the conditions, they would have ap- <br />. rejection of a proposed new public works facility. proved it hands down." - -- <br />Voters turned down the bond referendum last He pointed out the city has outgroWn the present <br />week by 169 votes - 2,546' to 2,377. facility at 1450 W. Higbway 96, whicb was built 40 <br />"It was not a mandate to do it or not a mandate years ago when there were only 900 people in the <br />not to do it," Mayor Tbomas Sather said. <br />But Sather, wbo strongly supported the referen- J MAYOR COI'(l1NUED ON 2 '" <br />~;~~~:~;; . <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />; MA YOR/Defeat called surprise <br />: ., CONTINUED FROM I If the 'i'eferendum had been ap- He said tbe defeat of the refer- <br />, . proved, taxes on a typical endum does not change plans for a <br />: community. The populatlon today $125,000 home would have In- new $900,000 City Hall. Money for' <br />: Is e,200. _ creased about $5 a month. the new City Hall already bas <br />, ,_Jlut nobody took the time to ")' d' . ted b t - been set aside by the city and was <br />, _ come and look" Sather said m lsappOID , U now we <br />, "Thel' atte t" th' will have to look at other alterna not part of the bond referendum. <br />t .r n 10D was on e na- . II . <br />, tiona1 and state races." tives, Sather salq. Sather said the city plans to go <br />I : Also, he said voters probably . He .said some of those alterna- ahead with building .a new City <br />'I ,were influenced by the require- tives lDclude possibly bringing an- Hall on the ~rsenal site proposed <br />: ment to state on the ballot that 'other referendum to a vote in six for the public works facility. He <br />, voting for the referendum will months, adding on to the current said the city currently is negotiat- <br />: ral~ the property tax. public works garage, or building a Ing a 99-year lease with the U.S. <br />, . Unfortunately, there was no new facility through a lease-buy- Army for about 40 acres on the <br />, space to say how much" Sather back program that wouldn't need eastern edge of the twin Cities <br />said. 'taxpayer approval. Army Ammunition Plant. <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.