Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />. MINUTES <br /> CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br /> REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> November 30, 1992 <br /> 7:30 P.M. - City Hall <br /> CALL TO ORDER/R9LL CA~L <br /> Note that Council met at 6:00 p.m., in closed session, for a <br /> strategy session relative to union negotiations. <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called <br /> to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. <br /> Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; Councilmembers JoAnn Growe, <br /> Dale Hicks, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone. Also present <br /> were: City Attorney, Jerry Filla; City Engineer, Terry <br /> Maurer; Public Works Superintendent, Dan Winkel; Clerk <br /> Administrator, Dorothy Person; Deputy Clerk/Zoning <br /> Administrator, Catherine Iago; Recording Secretary, Shar <br /> Foster. <br />. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING <br /> Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:31 p.m. for the purpose <br /> of conducting a public hearing on the matter of the proposed <br /> 1993 budget/levy. Administrator Person reported that Truth <br /> In Taxation notices, in compliance with State law, were <br /> mailed on November 25, 1992. <br /> Administrator Person stated that the proposed budget and <br /> preliminary maximum levy figures are as follows: <br /> General Fund 1,481,472 <br /> Aerial Platform Ladder 82,460 <br /> Capital Equipment Program #1 26,068 <br /> Total 1,590,000 <br /> She explained that the budgeting process begins in May, <br /> continues with reviews, additions, deletions, revisions, <br /> identification of goals and objectives, etc. , a proposed <br /> maximum levy is reported in September, and public hearings <br /> are held near year end before final adoption of the budget. <br /> She added that taxing jurisdictions must submit their <br /> proposed maximum levy in September, taxpayers are then <br /> provided with parcel-specific information as to anticipated <br />. taxes payable based upon those proposed maximum levies, and <br /> taxing jurisdictions can reduce but not increase their <br /> levies after submittal of their proposed maximum figures. <br />