My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-21-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 12-21-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINUTES. WORKSESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />DECEMBER 21, 1992 <br />PAGE TWO , <br /> , . <br />Further discussion took place regarding the impact of this road and the turnback system. <br />Ray McGraw indicated that as an alternative such as a viaduct or overpass be <br />considered. Jean Lemberg and Ray McGraw indicated that the citizens in the area <br />primarily affected during rush hours and that any study on County Road E changes and <br />flow of traffic and volume of traffic should include these time periods. The Engineer <br />will get further information from MnDOT as to the length of time and time of day that <br />the study took place. He indicated that normally the County review is made during a <br />24.48 hour period. The Engineer also indicated the City will want a Feasibility Study if <br />the Council decides this is the best route. It was suggested that an Informational <br />Meeting be held with the public to get further input and opinions from additional <br />members of the public. The Public President requested that MnDOT's perspective be <br />reviewed in a public meeting with a representative such as Tom O'Keefe and that <br />further information be received from the City Engineer regarding other alternatives. <br />(Mayor Tom Sather joined the meeting at this time - 5:30 p.m.) <br />Further information was discussed regarding the possibility of holding a public meeting <br />on the TH. 51 and Old Snelling crossing. Determination was made that at the January <br />25 meeting, the City will be prepared to discuss the alternatives. At the December 28 <br />meeting, the City Engineer will request the City to authorize a feasibility study be <br />completed based on the review at the Worksession with recommendations. . <br />The Council identified at the January 25 meeting to review and debate the merits of <br />options at this intersection. At that time, the Council will decide with proceeding with <br />one of the options for further input from the Engineer or they will decide to request <br />from the public at a further date. <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, that the City recognize the Pavement <br /> Management Plan and request a Feasibility Study during the Monday, <br /> December 28 meeting. It was requested that the City Engineer, in <br /> January, discuss further the timing of a Storm Water Utility and <br /> information for a public meeting to be held in early March. And, at the <br /> January 25 meeting, have a public meeting to discuss TH. 51 and Old <br /> Snelling public informational meeting regarding options and to request <br /> input from the public regarding impact of any of the options and to <br /> provide an opportunity to introduce further options. <br />At this time, the Council requested additional information prior to any decision being <br />made regarding whether to proceed and. if so, which alternative to investigate further. <br />The Council agreed that a letter to the School District be written to request their input <br />on any impact on signing of the TH. 51 and Snelling Avenue. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.