Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 8, 2024 11 <br />agreed to work on. She noted this was a timely issue that should be addressed prior to the June <br />budget discussions. She believed the 5:30 p.m. worksession meeting time was not working. She <br />supported the Council holding its worksession meetings at 5:00 p.m. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she would not object going back to 5:00 p.m. but noted when <br />the Councilmembers were elected, the third Monday of the month meetings were to be held at <br />5:00 p.m. and the other two meetings were to begin at 7:00 p.m. She stated due to personal <br />reasons, she could not be at meetings prior to 5:00 p.m. She hoped the Council would keep <br />meetings times so that all members could attend. She understood Councilmembers wanted to <br />spend more time with their families and noted this could be accomplished by spreading out the <br />committee appointments. She believed it would be complicated to have the Council rating items <br />by priority at each worksession meeting. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she generally felt neutral about the agenda setting policy until <br />recently when it became clear that the Council's priorities were not clear and the Council did not <br />hold a strategic goal setting meeting. She commented on how challenging it was to call a special <br />Council worksession for April 15 and therefore she did not believe the current agenda setting <br />policy was working. She indicated she was willing to give this a go and could rely on the Mayor <br />during worksessions to set aside several minutes at the end of each meeting to discuss upcoming <br />priorities. <br />Councilmember Fabel reported he was comfortable with the proposal. <br />Mayor Grant indicated he was not comfortable with the proposal. He believed the list was long <br />now and would be knocked off shortly. He stated if the Council wanted to get through these <br />items, he did not believe specific procedures had to be put in place, rather the items had to be <br />discussed in a concise matter and the Council had to move on. He suggested before procedural <br />changes are made, that the Council be allowed to work through items on April 15 and April 22 <br />and after that time the list will narrow. <br />Councilmember Holden stated back in November when the scheduling changes were made for <br />the worksessions, she was told the changes were being made for staff. She believed adding <br />worksessions would now be burdensome for staff. She indicated the strategic planning retreat was <br />nixed because the Council was told these items could be addressed at regular worksessions. She <br />questioned which items were a priority for the City versus a personal priority. She suggested <br />some of the items be addressed by staff versus being further vetted by the Council. <br />Mayor Grant reported the Old Snelling matter would not take long to discuss. He understood <br />there were difficulties in getting to all the items. However, he was of the opinion the Council <br />could get through all of the items without putting new policies in place. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion to approve the agenda setting policy as outlined in the memorandum <br />from staff dated March 11, 2024. <br />Councilmember Holden stated approving this policy would take any power away from the <br />Mayor to set an agenda. <br />