Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> Arden Hills Council 3 December 14, 1992 <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> CASE #92-21 - MINOR <br /> SUBDIVISION/LOT CONSOLIDATION <br /> CONTROL DATA SYSTEMS <br /> City planner Bergly explained that control Data Systems 1S <br /> requesting approval to consolidate parcels which they own <br /> and then subdivide the consolidated property into three <br /> parcels. He outlined the boundaries of the subject parcel, <br /> and boundaries and ownership of adjacent properties. <br /> Bergly stated that the lot consolidation/minor subdivision <br /> would create parcels A, B, and C. He added that parcel A is <br /> the NSP substation, parcel B would be the combination of two <br /> parcels into a long, rectangular developable lot (for which <br /> there is already a buyer), and parcel C would be an L-shaped <br /> parcel which contains the north wing of the control Data <br /> Systems building. <br /> Bergly stated that the Planning Commission has recommended <br />. approval subject to the applicant dedicating rights-of-way <br /> where there are currently easements for abutting streets. <br /> He pointed out the location of utility and drainage <br /> easements and stated these easements have all been approved <br /> by the City Engineer. Bergly said recent State 1 egisl aUon, <br /> administered by watershed districts, requires that wetlands <br /> be defined, so Rice Creek Watershed District must review and <br /> approve wetland easements. He added that the surveyor has <br /> revised the subdivision plan and descriptions and has <br /> included all the easements as recommended by the Planning <br /> Commission, and those changes are included in the plans <br /> shown tonight. <br /> Bergly explained that conveyance of property is intended and <br /> it is recommended by the Planning Commission that the <br /> applicant be allowed to submit this to the County for filing <br /> as a minor subdivision rather than a plat. <br /> Bergly advised that the Planning Commission and staff are <br /> recommending approval of Case #92-21 with the following <br /> conditions: 1) Parcels A, B, and C shall not incl ude the <br /> rights-of-way of abutting streets either in the delineation <br /> on the subdivision plan or in the legal descriptions, 2) The <br /> City Engineer and Attorney review and approve the plan and <br /> any conveyance or easement documents pri or to filing, 3) <br /> Rice Creek Watershed District review and approve wetland <br />. ';: '3.S c;n~~n ts I and 4) Park dedication be resolved prior to <br /> development of the property". <br />