Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . <br /> p' "Tin; TVT r. .....; ~sion Meeti.ncr 10 03-3-93 <br /> Cl\SE #93-04 (Contim'ed) . <br /> Mr. sticha explained it is his urxierstarrlin] within 10 years there will <br /> be new changes such as digital technology, however, he was unable to <br /> give a time frame. <br /> McGraw IllOIIE!d, secon:1ed by Erickson to r..........'.....m to Council <br /> denial of Case #93-04, Special Use Permit Amerxlment, install cellular <br /> phone antennae on the Vaughn Radio Tower, based on the fact that <br /> approval of this proposal would constitute expansion of a nonconforming <br /> use in the GB District. Motion carried unanimously. (7-0) . <br /> McGraw suggested City staff have a letter in writin] from the City <br /> Attorney as to the legalities of the issue. <br /> DISCUSSICN: 0l'HER PL1lNNING ISSUES <br /> STATUS REPCRl' CN BERM AT BRUEBERRY AND l'l\RRSIICRE tIUVE. PAUL l\:ELEHlm <br /> As the developer of Edgewater Estates, Paul Keleher was present, C1lair <br /> winiecki offered discussion of this item take place at this time. <br /> Planner Bergly distributed handouts of the j,1,LU~ amended changes of the <br /> berm. The drainage was verified at 902.1; the culvert was verified to be 12 <br /> inches; the elevation of the lower berm to the west would be trllnmed an <br /> additional 1 1/2 feet; the middle berm trllnmed 2 feet; and the east berm <br /> trllnmed 1 foot. !hese changes were met with the approval of the existin] . <br /> homeowners. <br /> Erickson preferred the fill be removed to expose the manhole cover and <br /> regraded. <br /> piotrowski indicated that the residents recormnendations IM.Y be considered, <br /> although the existin:J residents may not always be the tenants of this <br /> facility. <br /> Chair winiecki asked Commission member to offer suggestions relatin] to the <br /> proposed changes to the berm or indicate their preference that the berm be <br /> returned to conform to the approved gradin] plan. <br /> Commission concurred that the original gradin] plan was preferable although <br /> there may be a compromise to accommodate the residents concerns relatin] to <br /> screenin] and noise. <br /> The Commission requested the developer consider exposin] the manhole and <br /> regraclinJ of that area to allow vehicle access for maintenance purposes; lower <br /> the berm and attempt to accomplish the screenin] for the residents with <br /> larrlscapin] . <br /> No formal action taken on this IM.tter. <br /> ZCI!lIm ORDINl'.NCE RECX:t!MENIlM'ICN AND SIGN CIlDnu.NCE lUXDoIMENDM'ICN <br /> The Commission concu=ed that the Zoning Ordinance revisions including parking . <br /> regulations and the Sign Ordinance amendments are complete and ready to <br /> forward to Council. staff advised that COUncil would determine if the Public <br /> Hearin] relatin] to these matters would be held at the Council meetin] or <br />