Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> --- <br /> 1 . 0Cmn' . Meetinq 4 04-o7-9~ <br /> p ann,""J 'Q1on <br /> Cl\SE #93-01 cOontirP.....) . <br /> add erosion =ntrol to his list of items to be inspected durin;r the <br /> I::W.lding inspection procedures am that erosion =ntrol be in place <br /> before any J:W.lding =nstruction takes place. Rye commented that fast <br /> germinating grass be planted to stabilize graded areas. <br /> McGraw questioned whether the Canunission has the authority to require a <br /> developer to stabilize grading within a certain period of tine. <br /> Erickson located the Ordinance in the Zoning Code, Section 6, page 17 <br /> which stipulates a recommerxied method is permissible, no tine frame is <br /> stipulated, J:ut would be appropriate. <br /> Erickson questioned the issue of Park Dedication fees. Bergly stated <br /> the fees will be part of the purchase agreement am staff will allocate <br /> the appropriate proportion of the sellin;r price to the park dedication <br /> fuOO.. <br /> Actin;r Chair Piotrowski askerl if there were any questions or c:omments <br /> from the floor. <br /> 'Il1e Developer, Paul Keleher stated that RCWD had approved the plan am <br /> that he submitted the $1,000 SUrety Bond to RCWD this date. <br /> Actin;r 01ai.r Piotrowski closed the public hearin;r at 8: 02 pII. <br /> Actin;r Chair piotrowski askerl if there were any additional questions or . <br /> comments from the Canunission. <br /> Erickson !roVed, seconded by McGraw to reconnnend to Council <br /> to waive the Development MJratorium Ordinance am to reconnnend to <br /> Council approval of the Rezoning from R-1 to R-3 with the rationale <br /> included in the Planner's report of 4/7/93. All voted in favor. (4-0). <br /> McGraw !roVed, seconded by Erickson to recommend to Council <br /> approval of Case #93-01 P{JJ) Final Plan 2 Townhome Units with the <br /> rationale outlined in #3, a,b & c of the Planner's report of 4-7-93, and <br /> with the requirement that the Townhame Association in=rporate in their <br /> By-taws the requirement for assuming responsibility for maintai.nin;r the <br /> landscaping on the berm, am that Erosion Control including l:ut not <br /> limited to silt fence be erected prior to any site grading am that it <br /> be maintained throughout the project am soils should be stabilized <br /> within 72 hours of corrpletion of final grading with terrporary vegetation <br /> =ver or sodding as determined by the project foreman. All voted in <br /> favor. (4-0). <br /> Community Plannin;r Coordinator Iago eJq:llained to the Developer that <br /> procedure has changed and Planning Commission recommendations will be <br /> presented to Council at their last Council meeting of the month, instead <br /> of their first Council meeting of the month. Developer became quite <br /> frustrated at learni.no of this change in procedure this evening as <br /> tinting is critical to begin const:J:uction. It was suggested by staff . <br /> that since this change was not =nveyed to him prior to this evening, <br /> staff would look into the possibility of adding this one case to the <br /> April 12 Council agenda. <br /> - __ ___.___ _n___n_.____ <br /> -- ----- <br />