My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-20-1993
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CCP 04-20-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:25 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:50:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />APR'-20-93 TUE 1:=: : 1 '3 SANDER A ~~ D ASSOC I ATE:::: P.02 <br />, <br />f-"""'- ~-,,"-"r-"",," X ~ ~-"-"-"0KJr;r '" ~'-"-" W -"'->CJ> X ""-.E~-"""'-"'-.E-"-""4 <br /> 1t <br /> 1 <br /> ...,~ "" ~~" '" ~ ~'"", -~ ! <br />~ ' 1 <br />I WACKER ", ARCHITECTS Sa,nt Paul, M,nnesol. 55101 I <br /> , <br />, WEHRMAN AND 612-221-0401 1 <br /> BERGLY PlANNERS Fax: 612-297-6817 luJ <br /> lUll <br /> April 20, 1993 i <br /> , <br /> I <br /> , <br />rJ ~I <br />r~ Ms. Dorothy Person, Administrator , <br /> i <br />W~ City of Arden Hills , <br /> i <br />! 1450 West Highway 96 ~/t! <br /> Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 , <br /> Z' <br /> I <br />~ RE: Everest's Proposal for the Gateway Business District I <br />WI <br />WJ Dear Ms. Person: <br />WJ <br />1M As you requested, this letter will briefly compare the latest Everest proposal (April 14, 1993) <br /> with their earlier proposal (February 12, 1993) and with the GB District regulations. <br />'" <br />~ On Monday March 1st, you and I met with Tim Nelson and Bill Franke of Everest to work out <br /> some of the issues raised at the Council's work-session of February 16th. I believe Everest was <br /> clearly dir,~ted to revise their proposal to more closely respond to GB District regulations. <br />Z I feel that in some cases their latest proposal, by its greater specificity, deviates even farther from b <br /> the City's intent, e.g.: <br /> a. It is now proposed that masonry block be permitted on all rear walls ("masonry" <br /> is distinguished from "architectural decorative masonry. block), and that WI <br /> architectural decorative block be permitted on all walls lacking prominent freeway , <br /> exposure. z <br /> z <br /> b. It is now proposed that the required 15 % landscaped area in parking lots be <br /> removed. <br /> ~ <br /> c. It is now proposed that parking setbacks not be required for interior lot lines. ~ <br /> (The GB Ordinance allows the City to approve such type of parking if it WI <br /> accomplishes the purposes of the District). 11 <br /> ~lIl <br /> ~/l <br /> 'fIj <br />WJ <br />~ Z <br />=_._"" _"".Jr:..ilLf!F:~_""....i'!!T_"'-ff!'..~-'ff_'l!<~~ "" "" "" ~ _"" __,.,- ,.,-~~_~~_"'_>C_....~ _"'."" _"'. ",_l~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.