Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . Arden Hills Council 7 June 14, 1993 <br /> Councilmember Probst recalled that perhaps the reason this <br /> matter was not brought to closure when it came before the <br /> Planning Commission was that although many residents were <br /> represented at the meetings, some affected parties were not <br /> available for input, therefore, other options were examined. <br /> Administrator Person stated that a public hearing would be <br /> required before action could be taken, and staff is seeking <br /> direction from Council as to what options they wish to <br /> consider. She advised that one of the expected Planning <br /> Commission agenda items, probably in August 1993, involves <br /> proposed subdivision of the Hanson property, which would be <br /> directly affected by extension of Shoreline Lane, <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski asked if the straight through <br /> connection of the two portions of Shoreline Lane would be a <br /> positive move from a utilities standpoint, Public Works <br /> Superintendent Winkel said it would be, and it would also be <br /> better for the Hanson property, Councilmember Malone added <br /> that connection of the street would be an improvement from <br /> . the standpoint of traffic circulation and emergency vehicle <br /> access. <br /> Filla said this street connection is not part of the City's <br /> official street map, but could be added to the map, <br /> thereafter considered a "paper street". He added that <br /> doing so should not be difficult and could be accomplished <br /> by staff perhaps with the assistance of City consultants. <br /> Councilmember Malone said that adding the street to the <br /> City's official street map would allow the City to plan for <br /> the street connection, <br /> Mayor Sather commented that it appears that any option other <br /> than creating a straight through connection of the two <br /> portions of Shoreline Lane could be problematic. <br /> Councilmember Hicks recalled that the Planning Commission's <br /> recommendation was for the straight through connection. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to direct staff <br /> to prepare the necessary background information and <br /> proposed amendments to the official City street map for <br /> Council review prior to Council consideration of <br /> setting a public hearing regarding the possible <br /> connection of the two existing portions of Shoreline <br /> Lane. Motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> . <br />