Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . Arden Hills council 5 July 26, 1993 <br /> 3 . Extend sewer main located on Lexington Avenue to the <br /> southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, and then the owner <br /> could extend a service line to this main - (cost about <br /> $21,000) <br /> 4. Expand the gravity sewer line along Shoreline Lane <br /> across the Bachman property - (cost about $8,000) <br /> Winkel stated that staff's recommendation is option 2 since <br /> option 4 does not appear to be acceptable by Bachman. <br /> Councilmember Malone asked how the other four created lots <br /> propose to manage sewage. Winkel explained that sanitary <br /> sewer service is readily available to Lot 2 , Block 2 and Lot <br /> 1, Block 2 through connection to readily available existing <br /> 1 i nes , and that Lot 1 , Block 1 has the option of arranging <br /> connection from Lexington Avenue or hook up to whatever <br /> arrangements are made for Lot 2, Block 1. He emphasized <br /> that the only problematic lot is Lot 2, Block 1 because it <br /> is landlocked and has no existing sanitary sewer line <br /> readily available. <br /> . Winkel noted that if option 2 were chosen, it would require <br /> the sewer line to cross a City easement (the Shoreline Lane <br /> right-of-way) . He commented that if option 2 were chosen, <br /> there would need to be an understanding between the City and <br /> the owner of Lot 2, Block 1 that the crossing of the <br /> Shoreline Lane easement would become null and void at such <br /> time in the future as Shoreline Lane were improved, and <br /> alternate sewer arrangements would then need to be made. <br /> City Engineer Maurer added that option 2 assumes that Lot 2, <br /> Block 1 would connect to the service available to Lot 1, <br /> Block 2. He strongly recommended that the connection be a <br /> private sewer service arrangement between the two property <br /> owners rather than the line becoming part of the City's <br /> sanitary sewer system. He said that the City could consent <br /> to the private sewer service arrangement, but given the <br /> unique circumstances in this case, he recommended the City <br /> not have ownership or maintenance responsibility. <br /> Maurer added that the "private sewer service" he recommends <br /> is a feasible approach and the only formal action required <br /> of the City is for the City to consent to that arrangement. <br /> The prospective buyer for Lot 2, Block 1 expressed concern <br /> regarding being required to hook up to the City's sanitary <br /> . sewer service should Shoreline Lane be improved sometime in <br /> the future. <br />