Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ Arden Hills Council 3 June 28, 1993 <br /> Bergly noted that the outcome of the June 7 meeting was that <br /> a recommendation was made to Council to approve an <br /> alignment, referred to as Option #2, which would allow <br /> Nelson's hookup to existing manholes and would include sharp <br /> angles in the sewer line, but would not affect the existing <br /> Klawiter sewer hookup, therefore, not require their consent. <br /> He emphasized that Option #2 is certainly not the preferred <br /> option from an engineering standpoint, but it would be <br /> workable without disturbing the Klawiter property, and the <br /> applicant would agree to it. <br /> Councilmember Probst asked how Option #2 would affect <br /> existing trees. Bergly stated that the Option #2 alignment <br /> would likely disturb a large oak which has already been <br /> damaged in that its top is broken out, and Nelson's proposed <br /> construction would likely also disturb a large maple on the <br /> Nelson property. <br /> Councilmember Hicks noted that the only reason the City <br /> ~ would even consider Option #2 is to satisfy the Klawiter's <br /> objections. that Option 12 is not a desirable alignment. <br /> Councilmember Malone commented that the ideal sanitary sewer <br /> situation would be for the Nelson property (and eventually <br /> the McCloskey and Klawiter properties and perhaps others on <br /> either side of the Nelson property) to be serviced by <br /> sanitary sewer from the street side of the properties rather <br /> than from the lakeside of the properties. He added that <br /> regardless of who pays for a realigned sewer line, the new <br /> creation would be the responsibility of the City, so the <br /> City should require a well-engineered alignment which is the <br /> most appropriate from the City's standpoint. He commented <br /> that sanitary sewer was made available from the lakeside of <br /> these properties many years ago, but since service from the <br /> street side would be far desirable, perhaps the City should <br /> consider correcting the entire situation rather than <br /> exacerbating the existing situation by approving Option #2. <br /> Mayor Sather commented that the City could vacate the <br /> existing easement and require Nelson to hook up to the <br /> sanitary sewer service on the street side of his property, <br /> and over a period of time, require Nelson's neighbors to <br /> also hook up to service on the street side, Nelson advised <br /> that he has considered hooking up on the street side, and <br /> ~ would agree to do so even though the cost would be <br /> considerably more than hooking up to the lakeside service. <br />