Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . Page 2 <br /> Valuation Memo <br /> INVFSI'IGATION (FINDINGS CON 'T <br /> 4. It is apparent that l:usinesses have become very aggressive <br /> in challenging real property valuations as determined by the <br /> Ramsey County Assessor. See the enclosed table which <br /> highlights representative valuation chan;es for taxes <br /> payable in 1993 am 1994. <br /> 5. In addition to reduced valuations affecting the City's next <br /> year net tax capacity base, successful petitioners are also <br /> entitled to repayment of tax overpayments in the petition <br /> year. 'Ihrough the date of this memo, estilnated abatement <br /> refund amounts have not been made available from Ramsey <br /> County . However, it can be stated that the City's 1993 <br /> October tax settlement will be less that the 1993 May tax <br /> settlement because of these pending abatements. <br /> 1994 BUCGEr IMPAcr <br /> l. The 1993 certified levy was $1,590,000. 'Ihis levy was <br /> applied against an adjusted total tax capacity of <br /> $10,552,328. Assuming that personal property, tax <br /> . increment, am fiscal disparity factors remain constant, <br /> prelilninary 1994 adjusted total tax capacity could be <br /> estimated at $9,979,000. '!his estilnate represents a 5.43% <br /> reduction in tax capacity compared to 1993. <br /> 2. The reduction in tax capacity results from two sources: <br /> a) . '!he legislatively driven reduction in property <br /> class rates (eg.: Commercial property had a <br /> 4.70% class rate in 1993 vs. a 4.60% class rate <br /> in 1994-a 2.13% reduction). In theory, this <br /> reduction is offset by higher 1994 HACA aid (a <br /> $18,395 increase per Department of Revenue <br /> intornation) . <br /> b) . '!he reduction in net EMV results in <br /> corresponding reduced net tax capacity. This <br /> reduction can be offset by reduced City Tax <br /> rates or by having individual property tax bill <br /> increases exceed the levy (spending) in=ease. <br /> c) . It should also be noted that reduced commerical <br /> property valuation causes residential property <br /> owners to shoulder an increasingly greater <br /> proportionate share of the overall property tax <br /> burden . <br /> . <br />