CCP 08-30-1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Arden Hi 11 s Counci 1 4 August 9, 1993 . Prior to acting on this motion, the following discussion took place: Nelson stated that since recent negotiations with the Klawitters appear to be promising, and since he does not plan to build on his property in the near future, rather than possibly vacate the existing sanitary sewer easement prematurely, he would prefer to wait until negotiations with the Klawitters have been resolved. He suggested Council delay action regarding vacation of the existing easement until the next Counci 1 meeting. Councilmember Probst withdrew his motion. MOTION: Aplikowski moved, seconded by Probst, to table consideration of steve Nelson's requests for sanitary sewer easement vacation and sewer reconnectionl extension until the August 30, 1993 regular meeting of Counci 1 . Motion carried unanimously (3-0). REQUEST FOR REFUND OF RETAIL . SALES FEE - VICTOR SCEVERS Administrator Person recalled that in June 1993 victor Seevers applied for and was issued a retail sales permit to conduct rug and art retail sales at the corner of Lexington Avenue and County Road E at the Ramada Inn property. She reported that Mr. Seevers has now requested a refund of one- half of the fee he paid for a retail sales permit on the premise that the City voided the permit part way through the time he had planned to conduct retail sa 1 es . Person explained that Mr. Seevers paid the usual $50 fee for a retail sales permit. She noted that Mr. Seevers had indicated his desire to conduct retail sales during four separate time intervals between June 28 and September 24, 1993. She added, however, that the $50 fee Mr. Seevers paid is a flat fee charged by the City regardless of the time period or the number of times the appli.cant intends to conduct retail sales. Person recalled that on June 28, 1993, Counci 1 took action making Mr. Seevers' permit null and void after July 2 due to concerns relating to disturbance of City flowerbeds and sales being conducted within right-of-way. She reported that Mr. Seevers bases his request for a refund of one-half . of the fee on the premise that he was not allowed to conduct retail sales for the entire time he had intended.