Laserfiche WebLink
<br />---- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Arden Hi 11 s Counci 1 8 August 30, 1993 . <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />opined that limiting approvals to non-profit organizations is <br />not possible due to commerce concerns, but the City may <br />require proof of a County Auditor's permit (which includes the <br />posting of a bond) as part of the approval process. <br /> <br />Council briefly discussed how the City can advise residents of <br />their rights with regard to door-to-door solicitation. staff <br />was directed to investigate and report back to the Council <br />suggestions for informing residents as to their rights and <br />recommendations for appropriate Ordinance amendments to <br />address this matter. <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to make the approval <br />of door-to-door solicitation by Asphalt Driveway Company <br />(approved earl i er during Cons en t Ca 1 endar) sub ject to the <br />condition that the applicant provide proof of a County <br />Auditor's permit. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />ARDEN PLACE DRAINAGE <br /> <br />Warren McGuire, 1553 Arden Place, stated that as of September . <br />15, 1993, he and his family are moving out of state and he was <br />in attendance to answer any questions the Council may have <br />regarding drainage problems affecting his property. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Winkel commented that a public <br />hearing regarding the matter of Arden Hills drainage has been <br />tentatively set for the first regular October Council meeting. <br />Administrator Person advised that proper protocol requires <br />review of plans and specifications prior to ordering a hearing <br />and proper advanced notice of the hearing. <br /> <br />No changes to tentative public hearing dates were made. <br /> <br />EMPLOYEE REQUEST FOR REIMBUR~EMENT <br /> <br />Administrator Person reported that employees have requested <br />that employees who are charged by the IRS an additional <br />interest based on the Arden Hills 1991 - 1993 Section 125 Plan <br />be reimbursed. She commented that employees realize they had <br />use of the funds for one to three years, however, they believe <br />they would not be subject to the interest charge if they had <br />not been involved in the employer-provided Section 125 Plan. <br /> <br />Person noted that, to date, the cost to the City in correcting <br />the problems caused by the erroneous Section 125 Plan total <br />$4,025 ($1,250 for tax preparation fee reimbursement, $2,775 . <br />for employee FICA, and $2,775 for employer FICA). <br />