Laserfiche WebLink
<br />------------ <br />planninq n ..... i <<sion Meeting 6 11-03-93 <br />the property zoned R1. would enable new single family dwellings. He <br />strongly opposes the rezoning request. . <br />Mr. Hosler canmented that Ryder is only a renter, arxi the people voicing <br />their concerns this evening are property amer5. Mr. Hosler commented <br />that previous City Council members expressed their desire to let this <br />use "die a normal death", arxi have twice denied their request for <br />rezoning. Mr. Hosler agrees to just allow it to die. The owners of the <br />property have never done anything before to improve the site, the <br />building is going to collapse without improvements, arxi safety is his <br />main concern. <br />Mr. stenglein stated he has been a resident for 12 years. We are the <br />homeowners in the area arxi it is apparent that the neighhorhocxi does not <br />want to see this property rezoned. <br />Greg Colberg, 1784 Janet commented that he has witnessed after the <br />vehicles are repaired, they are driven down Janet Court (a short <br />culdesac with many children playing in the area) for a test drive. Mr. <br />Colberg's also concerned with fuel run off. Mr. Colberg further stated <br />that the water runs into his yard, and he too has noticed less wildlife <br />in the pond area. <br />Mr. Dischinger noted the drainage is to the northwest of the property. <br />cliff Aarnoth, 1748 W. County Rd. F asked Mr. Dischinger if Ryder would <br />consider reusing the east side of the brilding for parking. Mr . <br />Dischinger stated no, all the b.lses that were previously located on the . <br />east side have all l::een relocated to the west side of the property. <br />Sean Regan noted that neighbors cormnents over two recent deaths in the <br />area, in no way involved their b.lses. Mr. Regan further noted that <br />their expertise is in the rules, regulations arxi the manner in which to <br />operate a l:using l:usiness, and REXXl would not be interested in a strip <br />mall. Mr. Regan agrees with the neighbors that rezoning may not be <br />needed, but perhaps lllOre fine tuning is needed by staff to come up with <br />a reasonable alternative. <br />Chair winiecki closed the public hearing at 8: 53 pm arxi asked the <br />Commission members if they had any questions or comments. <br />Mr. Rye overviewed the neighbors concerns and stated he saw two options <br />available either to rezone or phase the non-confonnin;J use out over a <br />perio:l of time. He questioned what would be the worse case scenario, <br />and whether a strip mall would be better for this property than the <br />=ent conditions. <br />Mr. Carlson asked for a clarification that benning, landscaping arxi <br />other improvements cannot be done unless the rezoning is approved. Mr. <br />Fritsinger stated that as a non-conforming use, Ryder cannot enqxmd or <br />improve, Ryder can only operate as they =ently are. <br />Mr. Carlson questioned whether the zoning ordinance itself or possible . <br />other laws could allow a cease and dPrP"I<<p as their are issues of <br />drainage, erosion arxi enviromnental concerns. Could the City enforce <br />through civil or through court pr=edures if certain =iteria was met. <br />-------- <br />