Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ CCMMISSICIN CCI!MENTS <br />. 'Ihe Commission had minbnal questions on this caSe. staff found no evidence of <br /> the easement running North or South of the properties in question. staff also <br /> clarified discussions with several neighbors who were unaware of the easement. <br /> No neighbors = concerned citizens were in attendance. <br /> OPl'IOOS <br /> L Move to grant the vacation of easement for the area as legally described <br /> as detailed on Attachment F. <br /> 2. Move to grant the vacation of easement for only Lot 7, legally described <br /> as detailed on Attachment F. <br /> 3. Move to deny the request for a vacation of easement at 3945 Rolling <br /> Hills Road. <br /> 4. Table the request for further information from staff. <br /> RE:CCJoIMENDM'ION <br /> 'Ihe Planning Commission unanimously reconunended to the City Council, approval <br /> of the request for the vacation of easement for the area legally described as <br /> detailed on Attachment F, option L <br /> Attached is Resolution No. 93-56 vacating the Shorewood Hills No.6 utility <br /> Easement. 'Ihe city council should approve this resolution. <br />. <br /> > <br /> -- <br />. <br /> ----- <br />