Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />, <br /> CITY OF A1lDDl HILLS <br />. MEH:R1lNOOM <br /> Dl\TE: ~her 10, 1993 <br /> TO: Mayor and Council <br /> FRaI: Dorothy A. Person, City 1ldministrator <br /> SUBJJ!X:T: Sanitary Sewer 1\greement between the City of Shoreview, city <br /> of Arden Hills and TC1lAP <br /> At the November 9 Council meeting, you received information regarding a <br /> request for a sanitary sewer connection to J:e installed as soon as <br /> feasibly possible from the area near the manhole near MNOOr in the City <br /> of Arden Hills to the City of Shoreview on TCAAP property. TCAAP <br /> anticipates a continuous flow of 40 gallons of water per minute per <br /> year. 'Ibis flow will J:e initally received from eight wells, and same <br /> years later (4-10 years) this would drop to four wells. 'Ibis slightly <br /> contaminated water is from their cleaning activities. MWCC has been <br /> notified and the Anny is awaiting final approval. '!his method for <br /> discharge provides for the manhole an:i line across the street in <br /> Shoreview to receive the flow. <br />. One of Arden Hills' strategic planning priorities is to review long and <br /> short term needs, evaluation and identification of future utility system <br /> needs of the Arsenal/TCAAP. Further review has been made regarding Hwy <br /> 96 capacity vs. Co. Rd. I connection, its cost, and !:est use of the <br /> utility. The question is: would this Agreement J:e in the best interest <br /> of the City of Arden Hills? <br /> Our Engineer has advised that: <br /> 1) the approximate 2 mile distance from the site near County <br /> Road I to Hwy 96 would require a pl1I1p station due to lower <br /> elevation at I; <br /> 2) the line would J:e laid approx. 1/2 mile from the TCAAP <br /> property line (along I35W); <br /> 3) the cost of construction would J:e at least $200,000; <br /> 4) the line would J:e able to handle the anticipated capacity, <br /> but further review of Hwy 96 would J:e necessary. <br /> If the City constructed this line, it would take rrany years to recoup <br /> the cost, .possibly up to forty years unless another method was used. <br /> Additional related information from Mike Fix, Calmnander's Rep covering <br /> \ooIhy this location, \ooIhy not the Mpls line?: <br /> 1- The Shoreview system is econamicall y feasible due to the <br /> site of the contaminant. These are fram a shallow well (40 <br /> gal. min), and it is relatively clean water. <br />. <br />