CCP 01-31-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Case #94-07 Page 2 4-28-94 2. Miscellaneous Staff can find no specific reference to the swirrrning pcol in the case file or City Council, Planning Ccmnission, and Parks Ccmnittee minutes which may assist with this request. In reviewing amended SUP #75-6, it may l:e construed that the swirrrning pcol was an amenity required by the City in order for =nstruction of additional lots. The Planning Ccmnission has not l:een appointed with the responsibility of enforcing and/or negotiating the Park dedication fees or Code of Ordinances. These duties are the resp::msibility of the City Council and Parks Comnittee, Chapter 14 of the Cede of Ordinances addresses l1'Obile homes in Arden Hills. There are no requirements within this chapter of the Ordinance which require the rrobile home park to specifically maintain a swirrrning pcol. . However, Section 14-59 does address recreational areas, It states that "all l1'Obile home courts shall have one or l1'Ore recreational areas which shall J:e easily accessible to all =urt residents ... All equipment installed in such an area shall l:e owned and maintained by the owner or operator at his own expense. 11 The swimning pcol was not required as part of the park dedication ordinance. Because the swimning pcol was not part of the park dedication, staff l:elieves that Section 14-59 would not apply in this case. At the April 21, 1975 City Council m=eting, reference was made that under the Park [;edication Ordinance, 6 acres were required, The Park easement was approved as 3-1/2 acres and the developer was to install all equipment according to village specifications, There was no reference to the swirrrning pcol, At the July 12, 1976 City Council meeting, representatives of the l1'Obile home park approached the Council and arrong other . issues raised a concern aJ:out the swirrrning pcol, The Council --- ---.-