Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> r <br /> REVIEW SUMMARY <br /> . Board Review <br /> (Average of the points awarded by the Board reviewers) <br /> The extent to which the application demonstrates: J) an exceptional amount of <br /> creative thinking; 2) a well-thought-out planning process; 3) a commitment to <br /> working cooperatively with employees, consultants, and organizations to make the <br /> effort a success; and 4) a commitment to assume a significant degree of risk by <br /> proceeding with the project. <br /> (15 points maximum) '1 <br /> The extent to which the proposed project is likely to produce a product that will <br /> improve the quality of the service and will have benefits for other local <br /> governments contemplating the same type of cooperative effort. <br /> - <br /> (20 points maximum) 10 <br /> The extent to which the application's budget: 1) provides a sufficient level of <br /> detail; 2) maximizes the use of state funds; 3) demonstrates a commitment to <br /> providing local support for the project through direct financial participation and/or <br /> . in-kind contributions; and 4) limits expenditures to activities that are essential to <br /> the successful completion of the project. <br /> (15 points maximum) 7 <br /> The extent to which the application reflects the statutory goal of the grant <br /> program (to develop an intergovernmental cooperation plan to deliver a specific <br /> public service in a way that can be readily replicated by other local governments,) <br /> (20 points maximum) 10 <br /> The extent to which the proposed project is genuinely a good idea and warrants <br /> the state's financial participation. <br /> (15 points maximum) --.L <br /> Subtotal : Ys- <br /> . Page 3 <br />