My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-28-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 03-28-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:45 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:13:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . Two alternative scenarios come to mind if the TCAAP interceptor is classed a Metropolitan <br /> facility that is eligible for MWCC ownership. These scenarios are outlined below. <br /> Scenario 1 <br /> . U.S. Army constructs over-sized interceptor. <br /> . City of Arden Hills funds the over-sizing. <br /> . Arden Hills assumes ownership of the new interceptor. <br /> . Arden Hills requests that the MWCC acquire the new interceptor. <br /> At the time the new interceptor is acquired, Arden Hills would be reimbursed for the City's <br /> investment in the new interceptor. The MWCC's policy on acquisition does not allow <br /> reimbursement for facilities constructed with federal funds. Consequently, the U.S. Army would <br /> not receive any reimbursement from the MWCC. <br /> There is a potential problem with this scenario, however. The Metropolitan Council and the <br /> MWCC are very systematic about interceptor sewer planning. They do not want to over-build <br /> interceptor sewers because of the extra cost of doing so. Although over-sizing the TCAAP <br /> interceptor to permit future redevelopment may represent good long tenn planning, the <br /> Metropolitan Council and MWCC may resist paying for the over-sizing because there ,is11o , <br /> - ,~ ,4;-v <br /> concrete time frame for the redevelopment of TCAAP. :(his issue should be pursued further Wlth.-.; --- <br /> . the Metropolitan Council and the MWCC before the City of Arden Hills decides to fund over- - <br /> sizing of the TCAAP interceptor. - <br /> Scenario 2 <br /> . U.S. Army constructs 1,000 gpm interceptor. <br /> . Arden Hills assumes ownership of the new interceptor. <br /> . Arden Hills requests that the MWCC acquire the new interceptor. <br /> ~ <br /> Under this scenario, the TCAAP interceptor would be sized to accommodate the peak wastewater <br /> flow rate (1,000 gpm) of TCAAP as it exists today. Should TCAAP be abandoned and <br /> redeveloped, the new interceptor could be used to provide sewer service to the redevelopment. <br /> At such time that the peak rate of flow from the redevelopment exceeds the capacity of the new <br /> interceptor (1,000 gpm), the interceptor would be replaced with a larger interceptor. Because it <br /> would be a Metropolitan facility, the MWCC should be obligated to construct the larger <br /> interceptor. <br /> . <br /> Advantages of this scenario include the following: <br /> . There would be no investment of Arden Hills funds. <br /> . In the event that TCAAP doesn't redevelop for many years, money won't have been <br /> . committed for over-sizing that is of no use to anyone. <br /> 049-2203.feb S20-049-70 <br /> ---- -- --------------- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.