Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . . <br /> . Oak Grove Trust Members <br /> March 22. 1994 <br /> Page 8 <br /> IX. ALTERNATIVES TO SUPERFUND BILL. <br /> Enclosed as Exhibit R is an article on the Oak Grove Site from the February. 1994 <br /> Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Superfund Quarterly. The MPCA and the <br /> State legislature are using the Oak Grove Site as a "lightening rod" in an attempt to gather <br /> support for a proposal generally referred to as. " Alternatives to Superfund". Since the <br /> legislature is currently in session. the bill is being revised on almost a daily basis. and <br /> therefore I cannot provide you with specifics on the bill. I can advise you of the concept. <br /> however. The concept of the bill is that the State will take over responsibility for municipal <br /> landfills which were licensed by the State and which have now been closed. With respect to <br /> otherwise eligible landfills where the cleanup has already occurred. the bill proposes to <br /> reimburse the parties paying for the cleanup. less costs related to administrative and legal. <br /> actions required by the facility pennit. including characterization studies. closure. post closure <br /> care, and the acquisition of property. <br /> ? <br /> , <br /> It appears that this bill has a chance of passing the legislature this year. This is - <br /> obviously potentially very significant to the Trust If the bill passes the Trust has the - <br /> "" <br /> .~_r <br /> opportunity to receive significant dollars from the State as well as having the State take over <br /> . long tenn management of the Site (hopefully including landfill gas issues). in return for the <br /> Trust not bringing a contribution suit against non-settlors. Some Trust members are lobbying <br /> on this bill on their behalf. and some members of my finn are lobbying the bill on behalf of <br /> finn clients. Litigation Counsel is also closely monitoring the bill. I have only been involved <br /> in discussing the bill and the problems with it with these lobbyists. but no one is currently <br /> lobbying directly on behalf of the Trust I have asked the lobbyists in my fmn to advise me <br /> if it appears that the bill is getting close to becoming law and an effort directly on behalf of <br /> the Trust would be productive. If so advised, I will talk to the Trustees about whether the <br /> Trust should get involved in the debate, and if so, how. <br /> X. FINANCES. <br /> Enclosed as Exhibit S is a copy of correspondence from Litigation Counsel and a copy <br /> of the letter writing campaign account register. The letter writing campaign account has a <br /> balance of $2,412.923.89 as of March 14. 1994. The Oak Grove Trust will therefore receive <br /> approximately $1,608,000 of this amount shortly after entry of the Consent Decree. <br /> Enclosed as Exhibit T is a copy of Norwest Bank's Summary of Assets as of February <br /> 28. 1994, which shows a market value of $2.813,283.88. Overall. the Trust continues to <br /> remain within budget. but the Trustees and Common Counsel are concerned about the <br /> potential impact of the landfill gas issue on the budget The Trust budget has always been <br /> . 350/22040059 312~4 <br /> ---- -------------------- <br />