CCP 04-11-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Arden Hills Council 3 March 28, 1994 . Probst referred to a letter received in the packet from the Minnesota Council of Dog Clubs that addressed the issue of the number of dogs allowed. Nancy Johnson, President of the club, stated the organization's main concern was to allow flexibility in the number of dogs allowed. She further commented that the number of dogs allowed could be based on the size of the property. The club is currently working on a model code which would address the first tier suburbs, the second tier suburbs and inner city properties. Hicks asked for clarification that two dogs would be . allowed in a residential district without having to obtain a kennel permit. Fritsinger stated that was correct. Hicks asked Ms. Johnson what the Council may learn from the model code that is not already known. Ms. Johnson stated the model code addresses issues such as nuisances, rabies, quarantine, dangerous dogs, and the number of dogs allowed in various settings. . She further commended the staff on the proposed changes, however, she would like to see more flexibility with the number of dogs allowed. The number of dogs could be changed to a maximum of five or six dogs with the appropriate conditions being met in relation to lot sizes, inspections and enforcement. Malone asked whether the model code provided for provisions to square footage and if some type of formula would be used to determine the appropriate number of dogs allowed. Ms. Johnson stated they have not incorporated a formula, however, this would not be an unreasonable request. Edward Adkins, representing the Dog Owners Association, stated that most animal control situations are not related to the number of dogs at a home. The complaints usually stem from the irresponsibility of the dog owner. The issue of the number of dogs should be based on whether or not there is soundproofing, containment, waste removal, public safety, health safety and ownership attitude. .