My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-25-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 04-25-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:47 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:20:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> . MIMJRANDCM <br /> DATE: March 29, 1994 <br /> TO: Brian FritsiIlqer. C.......1I1ity Developlll!D.t Coordi.nato@ <br /> FRCM: Arden Hills Planning Calm; ..,,;....., <br /> SUBoJE::l' : Rice Creek Watershed District Pel:mits <br /> Attached you will find pennit inforrration frc::m Rice Creek Watershed <br /> District. I obtained this inforrration after holding a discussion with <br /> Kate Drewery at Rice Creek Watershed District. , <br /> As you can see, Rice Creek Watershed District does review all of the <br /> following : <br /> Land I:evelopnent Plans Final Site Drainage Plans <br /> Stormwater Managerrent Plans Wetland Alteration <br /> Shoreland Alteration Grading/Erosion Control Plan <br /> Public/Private Drainage Rough Grading Plan <br /> . '!he review of site plans vary depending on the type and size of the <br /> project (see inforrration sheet.) In short, those issues identified by <br /> the Planning Corrmission while reviewing the McClung Preliminary Plat are <br /> reviewed by Rice Creek Watershed District. The issue, however, is when <br /> the plan is reviewed. According to Ms. Drewery, nost comnunities <br /> undertake a concept review stage where the City rrakes carrrents and then <br /> sends the plan to Rice Creek Watershed District for review. Thus, when <br /> a forrral preliminary plat application is su1:mitted nost of the <br /> information identified in the McClung case IoOlld be attached. <br /> As Arden Hills does not have a fonnal =cept review stage, it may be <br /> appropriate for staff to ccrrplete its review and then require the <br /> applicant to w:::rk with Rice Cree.l<: Watershed District prior to su1:mitting <br /> a forrral application. The procedural requirement w:::uld be fairly sirrple <br /> to. irrplernent . <br /> The broader question raised at the last rreeting was who should be <br /> resp:msible for review of the a\:;ove. Ms. Dre'.oJery indicated that none of <br /> the local governments within the Rice Creek Watershed District have <br /> opted to take the resp::>nsibility to review the a\:;ove. Each corrrnunity <br /> . which has adopted its Water Management Plan has given this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.