My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-24-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
05-13-24-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 9:56:50 AM
Creation date
5/13/2024 5:15:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CIP — Fund Balances Projected <br />Future Projects (excludes Lake Jo & Old Hwy 10 trail projects) <br />S; ODO,DDD - <br />$3,00D, 000 <br />$2,D00,000 <br />$1,000,000 <br />s- <br />$(1,000,000) <br />s(2,000,000) <br />M 000 owl <br />■ PIR Reserve Balance <br />Equip, Bldg Reserve Balance Public Safety Reserve Balance <br />This chart displays the <br />projected health of three <br />CIP Fund Balances. <br />It identifies the <br />anticipated dips in Fund <br />Balance, as a result of <br />budgeted expenditures <br />exceeding budgeted <br />revenue resources. <br />CIP — Fund Balances Projected <br />Future Projects (includes Lake Jo & Old Hwy 10 trail projects) <br />53,DDD, DDD <br />5 DOD, ODD <br />5 _, DDO, DDO <br />$- <br />Si 1, ODD, 000) <br />ODD, 000) <br />$15 DDD, CDC <br />■ PIR Reserve Balance Equip, Bldg Reserve Balance ■ Public Safety Reserve Balance <br />This chart displays the <br />projected health of three <br />CIP Fund Balances. <br />It identifies the <br />anticipated dips in Fund <br />Balance, as a result of <br />budgeted expenditures <br />exceeding budgeted <br />revenue resources. <br />Attachment C is a one -page recap of the information provided at the Open House, which was <br />shared on the City's website, along with a survey that was released, thereafter, for City residents <br />and businesses to provide additional input through Monday, May 6th at Sam. There were 73 <br />residential survey responses, with approximately 54% choosing a franchise fee option (22% - <br />electric only; 32% - gas and electric), approximately 30% choosing a property tax levy option, and <br />approximately 17% choosing the combination of property tax levy and franchise fee option. For <br />those respondents who chose any combination of a franchise fee option, approximately 64% <br />indicated the City should consider dedicating the fees for a specific purpose. Some common <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.