Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> L ( <br /> ~ <br /> ~ League of Minnesota Cities 1[[iE <br /> Bu1iietin <br /> Cities <br /> Number 16 June 28,1994 <br /> Law prohibits gifts to local officials <br /> Duke Addicks and Joe/ Jamnik give a gift to a local official. A local or may provide goods or services to a <br /> I official may nOl accept a gift from an city, such as engineers, fiscal advisors, <br /> EffectiveAugust I, two provisions interested person." contractors, attorneys, sales representa, <br /> of a new law (Chapter 377) will This sounds simple but it isn'L tives, etc. <br /> But vinually every resident of a <br /> prohibit almost every gift to local (city Who is an "interested person?" city could have a direct financial <br /> and county) officials. The law states that an interested person interest in a decision that a local <br /> The portion of the new law which '''"means a person or representative of a official could make. Until this issue is <br /> applies to local officials in all cities and person or association that has a direct clarified our advice is simple: local <br /> counties is MiImesota Statutes 471.895. financial interest in a decision that a ofl1cials should not accept a gift from <br /> It states that "an interested person may local official is authorized to make." <br /> not give a gift or request another to This certainly includes anyone who is anyone. <br /> . But who is a "local official?" The <br /> law defmes local offICial 10 mean "an <br /> Members prioritize major city problems elected or appointed official of a <br /> county or a city or of any agency, <br /> authority, or instnlmentality of a county <br /> for policy adoption process See Gifts, page 7 <br /> Duke Addicks A majority of cities voting (51 <br /> percent) consider unfunded man- Calendar, bndget <br /> At the League's annual confer- dates to be the most serious problem <br /> ence in SL Paul, member cities facing cities for which there are memo available soon <br /> completed ballots prioritizing the legislative and congressional <br /> major city problems for the policy solutions. July calendar in this issue <br /> adoption process. League policy The next most serious problem <br /> committees have been appointed and (40 percent) is that workers' The annual updates of the <br /> will begin meeting in July to propose compensation rates are not competi- Ca/enOOr of Important Dates and <br /> I solutions to these major problems tive with neighboring states. This is the Guidelines for Preparing City <br /> which can be implemented by considered to be an economic Budgets will be mailed to cities <br /> legislative and congressional action. development and redevelopment soon. <br /> The major problems faciog issue. To help cletks, we have <br /> cities, and the percentage of cities The third most serious problem included the July calendar in this <br /> voting for each problem, are as (39 percent) is the aid penalties in issue of the Bulletin. <br /> follows: See Policy adoption, page 7 See pages 10-11. <br /> Page 3 . Building plans advance Page 5 - LMC 2000 Route to: <br /> . The LMCIT board approved partial LMC Futures Committee OKs <br /> ownership in the new LMC building strategic planning process <br /> 1 <br /> i <br />