Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . the six m:nths w:JUld suggest a spending level of 50% of annual <br /> budget as opposed to the 57%. indicated. <br /> d. The Ci ty =tinues to utilize less of Attorney Filla's tiTre <br /> than was budgeted ($4,199 actual versus $21,610 annual budget <br /> or 19%) for non-prosecution legal fees. <br /> e. Likewise, the City also =tinues to utilize less of Planner <br /> Bergly's tiTre than was budgeted, ($130 actual versus $15,000 <br /> annual budget, or 1%) . In conjunction with the TCAAP public <br /> meetings, the Planning D=part:rrent has incurred $2, 750 in <br /> professional services fees, (Brimeyer, $800 for facilitations; <br /> Huebsch, $1,950 for preparation of information rraterials) . <br /> f. Fire Protection departrrent expenses are not comparable to <br /> June, 1993 YID exp=nses in that 100% of the LJVFD contract has <br /> been paid in 1994 versus only 50% in 1993. The annual <br /> =tract price is actually down 2.6% in 1994 ccxrpared to 1993 <br /> ($168,500 versus $173,000 in 1993) . <br /> g. Street Maintenance department expenditures do not have any <br /> allocated 1994 paverrent ffi3.nagerrent or capital budget <br /> expenditures thus far. <br /> h. Park Maintenance departrrent costs are significantly <br /> . underrunning budget because of building/ground ffi3.intenance <br /> ffi3.terials, (Perry Park) and acquisition of capital budget <br /> items. <br /> ornER FUNDS: <br /> a. Program FUnd #226 Y'ID revenue ($69,219) is $8,228 (13.5%) <br /> higher than the ccnparable period last year. Y'ID <br /> expenditures ($48,234) are $919 (1.9%) than last year' s <br /> ccxrparable numbers. <br /> b. Community Services Fund #225 Y'ID revenue ($13,930) is up only <br /> rroderately over the ccnparable 1993 total ($13,019) or 7%. <br /> However, the Pot-O-Gold Bingo Hall was closed for the early <br /> rronths of 1993 and open for all of 1994. Fran this context, <br /> 1994 ffi3.y shape up to have worse revenue performance than 1993 <br /> and present operating subsidy transfer problems to FUnd #226 <br /> at year end. <br /> c. Wa t e r, Sewer and Surface Water Management expense generally <br /> reflect three rronths of revenue and six rronths of costs with <br /> the two prim3.ry exceptions te:illg seven rronths of M>lCC cost and <br /> only three llDnths of City of Roseville purchased water =st. <br /> If you have any questions on the above information or any other June <br /> financial data, do not hesitate to contact me. <br /> . <br /> 2 <br />