Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> MEMJRANDOM <br /> DATE: July 22, 1994 <br /> TO: Dorothy Person, City Administrator <br /> l'RCM: Dan Winkel, Public I'k>rks Superintendent A vJ. <br /> SUBJECT : RecOIllle!Ilded changes on the Arden Hills Traffic Sign <br /> Policy . <br /> As directed by Council, I requested City Attorney JeTI)' Filla to <br /> review the proposed Traffic Sign Policy. In his written response, Mr. <br /> Filla states that the installation of a sign must be approved by the <br /> City Council (Minnesota Statutes 169.06, SUbd.3 and 412.221, Sulxl.. 6, <br /> 7, and 18) . <br /> Enclosed is an arrended version of the Arden Hills Traffic Sign Policy <br /> that includes the City Council m3king the final decision as to where <br /> . the traffic sign should be installed. <br /> I also suggest to change the appeal process slightly. It is in my <br /> opinion that if there should J::e an appeal, it should go directly to <br /> the Council. It would be difficult for the Public Works Safety <br /> Corrmittee to offer an opinion when Council had previously trade a <br /> decision. The Public Works/Safety Ccmnittee would J::e available to <br /> help staff and Council gather additional info:rmation for the appeal <br /> review process. <br /> r:w:to <br /> . <br />