Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> AUG 08 .S''" 03: 32Pt1 ST. O)URT ADMInISTRHTOP F.12 l'? <br />. ARDE.~ Hn.LS CITY COUNCIL - JULy 25, 1994 11 <br /> Mayor Probst noted that the proposed resolution must be included with the grant application. <br /> He asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition or offer any further comment. There <br /> was no further comment, and Mayor Probst closed the public hearing. <br /> MOTION: by Malone, seconded by Aplikowski, to adopt Resolution No. 94-40 certifying <br /> that the City of Arden Hills may enter into an agreement with the State of <br /> Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and to execute the necessary <br /> agreements to apply for the grant. <br /> The motion carried (4-0). <br /> CASE NO. 94-18. MCCLUNG FOURTH ADDmON. FINAL PLAT <br /> Fritsinger stated that Mr. McClung has submitted a final plat for a nine-lot single family <br /> subdivision, McClung Fourth Addition. The plat is in ~mpliance with the subdivision <br /> ordinance. The Planning Commission approved the final plat, subject to City review of all <br /> documents. Staff is working on preparation of the Developer Agreement. Building <br /> specifications have been completed and reviewed by the City Engineer who has indicated that <br />. everything is in order. The City Attorney has reviewed the abstract title which is also in <br /> order. <br /> The contract with the developer would require two lots set aside as security for completion of <br /> the project. Upon a letter from the City Engineer indicating satisfactory completion, the two <br /> lots would be released back to the applicant for development. <br /> One other item is that the developer will be maintaining the street during the winter. A <br /> certificate of occupancy will not be issued until a letter is received from the City Engineer <br /> indicating that the road improvements are satisfactory, <br /> Malone noted that the lots are oddly and irregularly shaped with substantial drainage <br /> easements. It is to be noted that the irregularities and required drainage easements are not to <br /> be considered on their own as evidence of hardship for future variances. He also requested <br /> that the developer pay particular attention to the utility trenches to avoid any settlement. <br /> Hicks asked which two lots will be held by the City as security, Fritsinger answered, Lot <br /> Nos. 1 and 2. He concurred with Councilmember Malone's statement that the drainage <br /> easement and wetland delineation not be sufficient evidence of hardship in the future for <br /> consideration of variances. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks to approve the final plat for the McClung <br />. Fourth Addition, subject to fmalization of the development contract, noting the <br /> somewhat odd-shaped lots and drainage easements that are not to be <br /> considered in and of themselves evidence of hardship for future variances. <br /> The motion camed unanimously (4-0). <br /> -- <br />