My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-08-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 08-08-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:55 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:27:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, ... <br />. Minutes for Special Meeting, 2 June 27, 1994 <br /> ,-!-", <br /> be available to the taxing jurisdictions immediately. Normally a TIF district must terminate <br /> before any increase in taxes is realized. For every $1.00 of taxes generated, approximately 38 <br /> cents is immediately available to the City, County, School district and any other special taxing <br /> entities. <br /> Council discussed further the proposal, including review of infrastructure improvements needed, <br /> the potential cost and whether the pay as you go concept should be limited to this area. The <br /> current property owners will be directly contacted by Everest. <br /> Probst urged the Developer to recall the discussions held earlier re: the need to not develop a <br /> warehouse district only, He stated the design framework plan needs to be reviewed. <br /> Malone stated that he was not sure how the A TS would react to this type of proposal. He was <br /> unaware of the costs that might be affiliated. Nelson added that this area may take some time <br /> and that they ask for flexibility with the City in this portion of the development. <br /> Council stated it remained open to discussing further the various financing terms, but that it was <br /> cautious in the issuing of bonds. They had only previously considered the pay as you go <br /> concept. <br />. Hicks noted the comments re: negotiation of the contract. This allows for the City or the <br /> Developer to pullout of further discussions if at anytime either party does not comply with the <br /> terms of the contract, or for other reasons identified in the contract. <br /> Fritsinger noted that should the City enter into a contract, it also agrees to not negotiate with any <br /> other third party. <br /> Malone questioned the Developers understanding of paying costs. Fritsinger indicated that the <br /> Developer had paid $2,500 to date and will be depositing another $2,500 to cover costs upon <br /> execution of the contract to cover city costs. <br /> The Council concurred that this Preliminary Developer's Agreement is a viable alternative and <br /> that it would be added to the consent calendar for this night's Council meeting action (June 27, <br /> 1994) to approve the Agreement. Staff will inform the Council of any further developments. <br /> Dorothy Person, City Administrator <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.