My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-26-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 09-26-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:00 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:35:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~- <br /> . The primary provisions ofS. 1822 that affect through a video platform, which is specifically <br /> franchising authorities are: defined as "not a cable service" and not subject <br /> to cable franchising. As a practical matter, <br /> . Telephone companies and their affiliates will however, the bill is structured in a way that all <br /> be permitted to enter the cable television but assures that telephone companies will <br /> business and cable operators will be permitted choose the video platform approach and avoid <br /> into the telecommunications business. All state franchises and franchise fees. <br /> and local laws and regulations that are <br /> "barriers" to the ability of any entity to provide . Like H.R. 3626, S. 1822 shrinks the basis on <br /> interstate or intrastate telecommunications which cable operators may be required to pay a <br /> service are preempted. This provision is similar 5% franchise fee to revenue from "cable <br /> to language in H.R. 3626. services" only. This likely means that local <br /> governments will see an immediate loss of <br /> . Telephone companies may provide video revenue from curren t cable franchise fees. <br /> programming to subscribers in their own <br /> service area either through a cable system, in . Unlike H.R. 3626, S. 1822 goes further in <br /> which case they are cable operators subject to reducing revenue from franchise fees by <br /> the Cable Act, including franchising, or providing that video programming provided by <br /> . MILLER & HOLBROOKEINFORMATlONSERVICES U pda te provides in-depth coverage of cable <br /> television and telecommunications issues affecting local governments at the FCC, in the courts, <br /> and on Capitol Hill. Each issue contains the "must read" source documents important to local <br /> officials and cable operators. <br /> MILLER & HOLBROOKEINFORMATlONSERYICES Update is published monthly by Miller & <br /> Holbrooke Information Services, Inc., 1225 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. <br /> Telephone (202) 785-8827. Fax (202) 785-1234. Nikki L. Ward, Editor and Marketing Director. <br /> Subscriptions are $300 per year, $575 for two years. Additional copIes without documents to the <br /> same entity, $50 per year. Addresses in D.C. add 6% sales tax. <br /> U pda te is for informational purposes only and is not intended as, and should not be relied <br /> on as, legal advice to readers. Filing deadlines should always be verified directly with the relevant <br /> agency. <br /> . <br /> MILLER& HOLBROOKEINFORYlATlONSERVICES Update August 1994 Page 2 <br /> --- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.