Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 6 . <br /> everything appeared okay. There will be no accent lighting for the domes and spires. Two outdoor <br /> signs are proposed, one at each entrance. All mechanical equipment on the roof will be located on <br /> the south side and will have a painted screen, <br /> Fritsinger stated that the existing drainage flows through pipes at the northeast boundary of the <br /> property. The runoff from Highway 96 at TCAAP flows onto this site, into the wetland and is carried <br /> out through the North Heights Church drainage system by a series of existing pipes, In order to allow <br /> for drainage to flow under the proposed road, a new pipe is proposed. The City Engineer has <br /> reviewed the drainage plans and has no concerns other than to secure the easements for drainage. <br /> Fritsinger stated that MNIDOT has identified some issues, One is the runoff rate and flow control <br /> to make sure the pipe is of sufficient size to prevent any backup of water to the T .H. 96 ditch area. <br /> MNIDOT also has traffic concerns. The plan shows the same entrances as proposed in 1990, with <br /> a curb cut at the southeast corner and one on the north. There is a current median cut on T,H. 96, <br /> primarily to allow for left turns into the TCAAP property. Both MNIDOT and Ramsey County are <br /> concerned about traffic using that cut to turn left across eastbound traffic into the site. Ramsey <br /> County has encouraged staff to look at having the main entrance on Old Snelling. MN/DOT has <br /> indicated that they are willing to allow a right turn off ofT.H. 96 but no exit. Staff believes a right-in <br /> and right-out option would be appropriate. One of the difficulties in working with MNIDOT and the . <br /> county is that T.H. 96 is scheduled to be turned back to Ramsey County by November 1, 1994. Staff <br /> was able to have representatives from both the county and MNIDOT look at the site, and no major . <br /> problems were found. All of these issues must be resolved before a building permit can be issued for <br /> any construction on the site. <br /> Fritsinger reported that the Fire Department requested that the applicant prepare an area on the south <br /> side of the site to allow access for fire protection and emergency vehicles. The applicant has agreed <br /> to improve the south area of the site to a IO-ton capacity to accommodate emergency vehicle access. <br /> Fritsinger stated that the lot consolidation is necessary because of the number of variances which <br /> would be required otherwise, Staff is recommending consolidation at this time. <br /> Fritsinger stated that the last issue for consideration is park dedication. The subdivision ordinance <br /> does require park dedication. Based on past practice and using North Heights Church as an example, <br /> staff proposed that 10% park dedication be approved. The North Heights Church dedication was <br /> approximately 3/4 park and 1/4 wetland. In reviewing market value of the consolidation and park <br /> dedication, staff estimated that the park dedication is approximately $17,000 The City Council may <br /> consider the exclusion of the market value of the residential home which would reduce the fee to <br /> $7,200. The applicant had stated the park dedication requirements are unreasonable and would like <br /> further discussion on this matter. <br /> Fritsinger stated that the Planning Commission did review the proposal as presented and did , <br /> unanimously recommend approval of the lot consolidation to operate a house of worship on this site, <br />