|
<br /> TEL: Nov 14 94 15:31 No.OO4 P.06
<br /> Table 2
<br /> COSl' and Saving. related to Recycling Street Sweepings
<br />. P:.rtner Conunullity Annual Sand Laudfill Costs Recycle Cos". Savings from 'fatal Savings
<br /> Costs A n C reclaimed salld D (A+B+C)-D
<br /> ..
<br /> Shoreview S 5,850 S 71,825 S 2.789 S 250 S 72,07~
<br /> Vadllais H eigbts 2,025 24,905 967 86 24,992
<br /> Arden lIills 2.700 33,150 1,287 115 33,265
<br /> l'a1coll Heighrs 1,318 16.150 627 56 16.206
<br /> Lauderdale 279 3,400 132 12 3,412
<br /> New Ilrigbton 11,250 138.125 5,363 481 138.606
<br /> LillIe C.nada 1,440 17,680 686 61 17,742
<br /> Sub-Total-1 S 24,862 $ 305,235 S 11,851 S 1,062 S 306,298
<br /> While Bear 1,350 16.575 644 57 16,633
<br /> Township
<br /> Wblle Bear l_.ke 15,300 187,850 7,293 654 188,504
<br /> Roscville 17,100 209,950 8,151 731 210.G81
<br /> Sub-'l'olld-2 $ 33,750 $ 414,375 $16,088 $ 1,443 $ 415,818
<br /> Ramsey Counry S 108,000 $1.020,000 $39,600 S 3,552 $1.023.552
<br />. Toto" $ 156,6U $I,739,6W r----$~S39 $ 6,057 $1,745,668
<br /> · Recycle com ~ (Sand use x .65 pic.lc up x .8 recycJed)12O Ion per hour pro~ per hour. ~. ~tojtf r~1Ulf
<br /> .. Savings = (Average sand cast minus re.cycled sanrl costs) x tons of rccy<:led COStS, .YC nt'"
<br /> '-_._~ qil'llJr,.~
<br /> Benefits
<br /> Reprocessing these IDalCria/s would be CO$L-effe<.1ive if (a) sIan-up costs were covered. (b) many commwlilics would be
<br /> involved, and (c) reprocessing would be less thau disposing of materials. By joining together and sIlaring the selvice and
<br /> equiJl1l1cnt, smaller communi Lies can participate in savin&s due 10 econorni... of scale mat larger coDlluullities e.xl,cri"llce.
<br /> The nel result will he \letter community service "lid less COSlS to pass along to taxpayers. Also, by teducing the flow of
<br /> mSlerJal to I.ndmls, more space will be available for a longer rime for olher. more relevSlIl material. This also reduecs
<br /> the COIIUIIUniry'S expendilures for hauling lhe maleria/long distllllCel. Omer measurable benefils include a reduced cost to
<br /> pllrehase new maintenan.e materisls annually. The amountS aInled and me reduced amounl of DeW materials needed 10 be
<br /> pl,rchased annually will be Ule most direct measurable outcomes.
<br /> Cost-saving.
<br /> The propo'ed project guaranlecs proponional savings to panner communities based on the Slnoom of road m.inrenance
<br /> malen.ls Ilsed and recycled. Figures for recycling winler ice comrol sand indicates WSI lhere will be ailded costs over the
<br /> practice of dumping SLreel sweepings on public land. However, with the loss of lbat land, the allernative is a very
<br /> expensive landfill practice. Thi. project would virlually negatc that enol1llOlla cost inoroase and retain a Jow.cost meel
<br /> maimenance operation for Ille member communities. As the lables above indicate. costs of l1ll1dfilling: would amounlto
<br /> approximately $1.73 million. The leSults of the proposed rooyclillg project, just for ice control s""d alone. would
<br />. Gtant Proposal
<br /> Page 4
<br />
|