Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CI'lY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> . <br /> MEM:)RANIJlJM <br /> DATE: December 22, 1994 <br /> - <br /> TO: Terry Post, Acting City Administrator <br /> FRCM: Dan Winkel, PubJ.ic Works Superint"",rlent IJ, W . <br /> SOl3oJECl' : update on National Guard Reserve request for Sanitazy <br /> Sewer and Water camections. <br /> On Tuesday, December 20 Brian Fritsinger, Terry Mauer, and myself rret <br /> with representatives fran the National Guard Rese:rve to discuss <br /> sanitary sewer and domestic water connections to Arden Hills. The <br /> National Guard buildings are located North of Highway 96 and across <br /> the street frcrn City Hall. Also attending this meeting was Bill Block <br /> of Melchert/Block Associates who are the consulting engineers hired by <br /> the National Guard to develop plans and specifications for this <br /> project . <br /> . Mr. Block presented staff with a feasibility study which included <br /> plans and specifications which were CCXl!lleted in September, 1993. <br /> These plans indicated how the National Guard proposed to connect its <br /> facilities to the Arden Hills utilities in the area of Highway 96 and <br /> Hamline Ave. The scope of the proj ect proposed by the National Guard <br /> takes into ac=mt only the current needs of the National Guard. The <br /> plans do not take into ac=mt any future expansion of the line or <br /> oversizing of the main line. Staff is reviewing the information <br /> presented by Mr. Block with our City Engineer and will prepare a <br /> 8llllTl1al:Y for the City Council at a later date. <br /> It is anticipated that the National Guard and Mr. Block will intrcxiuce <br /> the request to connect to Arden Hills utilities at the January 9, 1995 <br /> Council Meeting. Mr. Block and the National Guard expressed their <br /> desire that this proposal be approved in its entirety on January 9. <br /> 'This approval w:::>uld allow the project to proceed according to <br /> schedule. Staff info:med Mr. Block that there are additional items to <br /> be evaluated by the City and a final staff report and reccrrmendation <br /> was unlikely by January 9. <br /> . <br />