Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - <br /> =- can be dedicated to transportation <br /> Solution Current city franchising programs. Cities should receive <br /> - authority should be replaced in favor of revenues necessary to meet present and <br /> local permitting authority: future transportation needs. If funding <br /> I does not come from the state, cities <br /> . State and federal governments must should have funding options available to <br /> develop and enforce minimum them to raise the dollars necessary to <br /> I technical and connectivity standards adequately fund roads and transit. <br /> and rate regulation in the absence of <br /> competition; With the exception of funding for the <br /> I state patrol, all nontransportation <br /> . The state should license programs should be funded from a <br /> telecommunications providers to source other than the highway user <br /> I ensure they have the financial, distribution fund. The revenues of the <br /> technical, and legal qualifications to highway user distribution fund are <br /> provide proposed services; collected from transportation users and <br /> I should be dedicated to transportation- <br /> . The state legislature should develop related services. <br /> I legislation to protect cities' interests <br /> in the management of local public <br /> rights-of-way and restructure and LE-15. Turnbacks of County <br /> I' simplify the regulatory framework and State Roads <br /> for telecommunications service <br /> providers in the state. Problem: As road funding becomes <br /> I increasingly inadequate, more roads are <br /> LE-14. Adequate Funding for being "turned back" to cities from counties <br /> and the state. <br /> I Transportation <br /> Solution: Turnbacks should not occur <br /> Problem: Current funding for roads and without direct funding or transfer of a <br /> . for transit systems across all government funding source. A process of negotiation <br /> levels in the state is not adequate. and mediation should govern the timing, <br /> I funding, and condition of turned-back <br /> Solution: Minnesota should value, and roads. City taxpayers should receive the <br /> adequately fund, all transportation same treatment as township taxpayers. <br /> I systems in the state. The state needs to The requirement for a public hearing, <br /> provide an objective basis to determine <br /> the complete needs of the road and standards about the conditions of <br /> . transit systems, their present condition, turn backs, and temporary maintenance <br /> and their impact on the economic health funding should also apply to county <br /> of the state. This should include turnbacks to cities. At a minimum, <br /> . acknowledgement that delaying current proposed roads to be turned back to a <br /> expenditures wiII increase costs in the lower government level should be <br /> .- future. Cities support an increase in the brought up to the standards of the <br /> gas tax and urge the legislature to receiving government or should be <br /> institute additional revenue sources that compensated with a direct payment. <br /> I 1995 City Policies 13 <br />