CCP 01-30-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

------------- -- , . I f. Approve List of 1995 Business and Rubbish Hauler License Renewals .- Staffrecommends Council approve sixty-eight business licenses and two rubbish hauler - (#95-15 and #95-16) licenses per the lists attached. g. Approve Municitlal Access Grant A\)\)lication to NSCC . Staff recommends Council to direct staff to submit a $7,500 municipal access grant application to the North Suburban Cable Commission (NSCC). A similar application . was submitted but not funded in 1994. If approved, grant proceeds will be used to document, in a video format, a history of the city's involvement with the TCAAP property. . h. ApDrove Claims and Pavroll Council is asked to approve $336,666.95 in vendor claims and 1995 bi-weekly payrolls - #1 and #2 for the period from 12/24/94 to 1/20/95. Vendor claims include $84,250.00 to the Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department for 50% of 1995 non-capital fire protection services and $120,571.56 to the City of Rose vi lie for fourth quarter (10/1/94 - 12/30/94) . water purchases. Unfinished and New Business - a. Planning Cases Mr. Fritsinger has written an overview memorandum on planning cases #95-01 (One -. Comm Corp antenna); #95-03 (East Side Beverage fence) and #95-04 (Bethel College site plan review). Note that the ultimate approval of the lease agreement with One Comm, Inc. is dependent upon Council first approving the SUP for Planning Case #95-01. The I lease document is in final draft stage and staff would welcome any Council input at this stage. . b. Bethel College SWM Appeal . Mr. Winkel and City Engineer Stonehouse have provided recommendations as follows for the two aspects of this pending Surface Water Management (SWM) appeal: . Rebate the associated Lake Valentine SWM charges ($2,943.35 per quarter) for 1) first, second and third quarters of 1994. This corresponds to the March, 1994 date . when this utility customer first advised the city of its intent to challenge the fees charged for the Lake Valentine acreage. This action also recommends not adjusting fees paid to the utility in 1993 from inception (second quarter 1993) . through fourth quarter 1993. 2) Deny the remaining aspects of the customer appeal that include classification and . associated rate per acre fees. The basis of Mr. Stonehouse's recommendation are conformance with the original intent of the ordinance and the primary determinant . being zoning classification and not current restrictions of a special use permit (SUP). -. . - ---