Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~--- <br /> . <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - Amil 10. 1995 .. <br /> 14 . <br /> MOTION: Hicks moved and Keirn seconded a motion to set a special meeting for April 17, . <br /> 1995, at 4:30 p.m. at the Army Reserve building. The motion passed unanimously <br /> (5-0). <br /> Adopt Resolution #95-28. Establishing the Assessed Cost for the County Road F . <br /> Reconstruction. <br /> Mr. Stonehouse indicated the City received bids for the project on March 30, 1995. He indicated . <br /> he recommended acceptance of all four bids and to award the bid to Midwest Asphalt, Inc. upon . <br /> approval of plans by MnDOT, completion of the assessment hearing, and final resolution of trail and <br /> street width issues; He also indicated all conditions and transactions as noted should be subject to <br /> review and input by the City Attorney. . <br /> Mr. Fritsinger indicated staffhas been working with the neighborhood and presented a few changes. <br /> Mr. Stonehouse indicated, from what he had reviewed, the changes would reduce the cost of the . <br /> project, but have no actual effect on the assessments. <br /> Counci1member Aplikowski inquired if the sidewalk would be removed. Mr. Fritsinger indicated -. <br /> it had not yet been agreed to. Councilmember Aplikowski was not in favor of sidewalks. <br /> Counci1member Ap1ikowski inquired if parking on the street was a concern for neighbors. Mr. . <br /> Stonehouse indicated the road would be wide enough, but there was concern regarding traffic if <br /> parking is allowed. <br /> Mayor Probst indicated based on comments from residents, the concern for the walkway was in . <br /> regards to impact on their properties. . <br /> Councilmember Malone indicated in the past, if there was a walkway people will use them, but he <br /> expressed mixed feelings regarding the walkway. He indicated perhaps an easement compromise . <br /> would help. <br /> Councilmember Malone indicated a parking ban on the street would be okay. He indicated the speed . <br /> limit would most likely remain the same. <br /> MOTION: Keirn moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #95-28, . <br /> Determining Assessed Cost ofImprovement and Ordering Preparation of Proposed <br /> Assessment Roll in the Matter of County Road F Street Improvements of 1995. <br /> Mr. Craig Wilson inquired as to why if the project costs were reduced, the assessment did not go . <br /> down. Mr. Stonehouse indicated the assessment per foot did not change due to the amount being -. <br /> based upon a typical street improvement, not necessarily this specific project. <br /> . <br />