My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-12-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 06-12-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:23 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:24:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> ,j <br /> CITY OF ARDEN IDLLS ' I <br /> MEMORANDUM .- <br /> r <br />DATE: June 8, 1995 I <br />TO: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator <br /> cc: Greg Stonehouse, City Engineer I <br />FROM:@ Terrance Post, City Accountant I <br />SUBJECT: National Guard SeweriWater Connection Project <br />On Monday, 6/5/95, Greg Stonehouse and I met with the following representatives of the State of I <br />Minnesota Department of Military Affairs concerning the above project: . <br />(1) Melchert - Block Associates, Inc. (Engineers for the State) <br />(2) Thomas Vesely - Architectural Supervisor I <br />(3) Suzanne Krueger - Contracts Officer <br />The purpose of the meeting was to share bid opening results and to determine to what extent, if .. <br />any, the City was willing to fmancially contribute to the project. <br />Bid results (see attached) were dismal. There were only two bidders with the "low" bidder I <br />exceeding estimated project costs ($147,830) by $68,570 (46.4%) and the "high" bidder <br />exceeding estimate by $184,079 (124.5%). An option that the State of Minnesota must explore is I <br />rebidding the project. <br />Mr. Stonehouse and I suggested that, in principle, the only costs that the City would be willing to I <br />participate in are those that relate to city requested "oversizing". <br />Engineer Stonehouse agreed that the portion of the lift station item costs that related to it being I <br />approximately thirty feet deep instead of eleven feet deep would be appropriate for the City to <br />fund. He estimated that this proportional cost of the lift station be $15,000 based upon the <br />estimated bid price of$40,000. Applying this 37.5% factor (i.e. $15,000/$40,000) to the "low" I <br />bid amount of $45,000 results in a potential city cost participation amount of$16,875. <br />Engineer Stonehouse also requested that Melchert -Block provide the engineering data to support I <br />why they believed a 10" DIP water main was adequate for facility needs including fire flow. If <br />the ten inch line is adequate for National Guard needs, the City Council could then consider, as a <br />cost participation alternate, paying the approximate $3,000 to oversize the water main to twelve I <br />inches. <br /> _I <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.