Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> I. ~l\PEN' HILl.s ctrY CO~ 12. tl)q5 6 <br /> I Mr. Voss also expressed con= for the wide 'street and traffic fnmi the high school. He indic:ued <br /> he has conw=ted the sheriff regarding 1IllIiic and grafIiti on me road signs and he believes the = <br /> I oeeds to be safer tor all. <br /> Mr. Voss indicated. he would have prefe:aed the walkway to be left in the project, but r-I;.,....; his <br /> I opinion was too late. <br /> Ms. Dorothy Raerz. 1703 County Road F West, inquUl:d as to me coSt of the road. and did not <br /> I understand how me 532.50 per front foot bad been established. Mayor Probst indicated. this <br /> assessment was based on the coSt ofreeOllSt1'llClion ofa "typical" resi,;""ri~t street. <br /> I Ms. Raetz inquired if the coSt of a resur:f3ce would have been less. Mayor Probst indicated. that <br /> would be correct, but the quality of the road would also be less. <br /> I Mr. Brad Kinner, 1745 County Road F West. indicared he also wished the walkway would. have <br /> been.,;,;..... <br /> I Mr. Kimler indicated he did not believe mere was enough benefit to his property to cover the cost <br /> of the assessment. <br /> I. Mr. Paul Tavernier, 1651 County Road F West, believed me residents were being..charged for <br /> a typical residential = without receiving the benefits of a typical residential street. <br /> I Mr. Tavernier indicated. he believed County Road F is a co=unity connector and me primary <br /> function of the road is for the bus company and school. <br /> I Mr. Tavernier suggested the residents along a commerciaJlindustrialroad be assessed by a different <br /> tormula. and that the entire co=unity be required to pay a larger portion. <br /> I Mr. Gaius Harmon., 1661 County Road F West. indicared he also did not believe the improvement <br /> would increase the value ofhis property. <br /> I :Vfr. Hamlon StreSsed that the traific speed restrictions should be ellIoJ;t:ed.. <br /> I Mr. Larry Parker, suggested the = of communications between residents and the City <br /> should be worked on. He believed the residents presented their feelings and concerns, but the <br /> Council has nOl really responded to the;n. <br /> I Mr. Dennis Zollinger, 1700 County Road F West, indicated the City Engineer believes this <br /> I reconstrUction will provide longer life of the road.. Mr. Zollinger inquired if this project would be <br /> similar to Snelling and'Lexington; would the residents be assessed for improvements again in 10 <br /> years. <br /> I. <br /> I <br />