CCP 06-26-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. _ '-1~E!-I ~TTY coti~TL . JUN~ 1" '995 q CYfayor Probst indic:=d tlm ~ amoumstill.........;..s to be based on=mauaion oia .~cliw I residential street. rn 1994 dlis was S29 .50 per from foot. but with im:1ation tlm .............",. is estimated at:532.50 perfrcm foot.. He DOted bids forS~ AVl:l1UC have come: infer :531.92 per I from. foot. Mayor Probst nri......red tlm fua tlm Coum:il is ayiDg to be ,~...,;hle with fimriing av>ri1"hj... .sllQ I 'lS MSA fm1rling, There are ii.mtre proj= tlIlItbave to be <=mri~ NIx. Tavemio:r indic:nea he is also crying to be ,~;sp...,<ih\e for ltis fiImily, he believed dJis was 311 I e..areme sac:'incc for ltis fiunil y. He quesliom:d wilat was 1iIir in dlis in..,.""..... Mayor Probst indic:=d me A =-= Policy was e:smbJisher:t to pay for 1:lle 30 mil.= of street in I Arti=n Hills. with the ~ dlat evemuaIly every property will be 1SS~ for lm;JI'Ove:n= He indic:m:d he C""!i7P'rl dDs willllot be =,/, Out o1:ller i"u~ert'f owner:; have ri1c::d rile same .ss--........- issues.. I NIx. Pham indicated as the City!i1Cl:s co I"...,a.e for expt"".Ii....~ so too. do the ~"""'- He indicated he wished tl1cre would be mote time to ~<.~e for tlm ~=. I A resident suggested the Assessment Policy be r<:Vised and the considera:rion of Coumy Road. I. =backs be addressed as special ciIcmnslam;cs. NIx. Parker indicated the A ......<:ment Policy is ODiy a guide. He indic:nea the residents are s....nng acla10wledgement oftlm aauai use of 1:lle road as ....""""'"'..;.u and not resin..",;,,1 I NIx. S""",,;,,- inquimi as Ul the life of1:lle road. Mr. Mauer.. iIldic:m:d by the te:abook. it wouid ICI1ect I aliie or 20 ye3n. but with m";",....,,,.,..,. he beiic:ved t!Ie life or t!Ie road wouid be lo~, Yir. Tavem:io:r inquired if all prior ~ still ~ly. Mayor Probst indic:m:d tl1at was .......= I Mayor Probst closed me Public H=ing at 9:2.5 p.m. I Councilmember ~ indicaIed. in regards co tile ~ cirt:umsW1ces of the Coumy Road n=back. she suggested tile monies rec::ived fro1n the Cllumy,shouid reiuce tile CitY and R~ri....,;,,1 obligation. I Counc'Jmembo:r Malone uidicated he was there when tile .<\s.--<:men.t Policy was established and many opaoDS were explored during me draiting of the Policy, He indicated. a per lot foxmula was I reviewed., but 1:llere was a problem wim me defuritiOIlS oflots. He noted in Mr. Tavernier's case 1:lle lot would be multi;Jlied by four to establish the "lSs~= on a per lot basis. . I Co uncilmember Malone continued.. me per front foot was established as me best tormula to estabiisil assessmems. I. I