My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-26-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 06-26-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:24 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:24:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> .. '~FNOO.LS CIT,YCOUNC~ 12.1995 ''7 <br /> - <br /> . Mayor Probst reconvened the meeting at 10:05 p.rn. <br /> Mayor Probst inquired. if all the appeals fall into an amoUDt category, <br /> . Mayor Probst indicated the ass"'l'ro1""t rate should be established first. before the appea1s are <br /> . accepted or denied. <br /> Councilinember Malone inquim1 if the aInOums are accmare, or if thee is 3JI'f evidence that changes <br /> . should be made EO the commercial or taX exeJlltlt =- Mr. Stonehouse felt the amountS were <br /> acc-.mue. <br /> . MOTION: Malone moved and Apiikowslci seconded a motion adollting Resolution 95-46. <br /> Establishing the Assessment Rate for Commercial of 544.00 per assessable front <br /> foot; Tax E:<""'Pt of 566. is per as~'l"hle ii:ont foot; ana Residential of 531.95 per <br /> . assessable front foot. <br /> Councilinember Apiikowslci questioned if thee was 3JI'f wa:y in wilich the Council could reduce the <br /> . rate of residential under 531. Councilmember Malone indicated after receiving bidll for Stowe <br /> A venue. he felt the amoUDt was in line. <br /> .. MOTION: Aplikowslci moved to amend the motion to show 531.00 per as~-~.h\e front foot. <br /> Motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> . Mayor Probst indicated for "the benefit of the residents, he fl'!"1i""" this was not the response "they <br /> desired., but "the rate was based on bidll received for Stowe A venue. He indicated the Council has <br /> . str1l.ggled with this issue., but feels this is fair to the emiIe community. <br /> Councilinember Aoiikowslci concum:d with the Mavor and believed this is best for the community, <br /> . . <br /> . The motion carried 11".."imously (4-0). <br /> . YlOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowslci seconded a motion to deny the "Lack ofBene:fits" <br /> objections of: <br /> Paul & Bev Tavernier 1651 W, Co. Rd. F, <br /> . Gaius E. Hannon Jr. 1661 W, Co. Rd. F. <br /> Paul S. Wallace 1779 W, Co. Rei. F, <br /> Huy Phmd76 1 W, Co. Rd. F, <br /> . Mr. 1. Dennis Zollinger 1700 W. Co: Rei. F, <br /> Donald &Ka:ren Ciske 1708 W, Co. Rd. F, <br /> Carl & Phyllis Hosler 1724 W. Co. Rd. F. <br /> . Lawrence & Karen Parker 1814 W. Co. Rd. F. <br /> Oscar & Linda Lund 4057 Fairview Ave. N" <br /> .. Cliff & lone Aamoth 1748 W, Co. Rd. F. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.