My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-10-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 07-10-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:24:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> 6RQEN HII"LS CrTY cowerL - JUNE 26. 1995 , .1 <br /> I <br /> feet (long side) plus 90 feet (short side) would be 50+90=140 front footage assessed. He noted there <br /> is a five year limit in which the property can use this formula. I <br /> Mr. Fregeau inquired, if one street is a County Road, would the County still take this formula into <br /> consideration. Councilmember Malone indicated the County would assess through the City, so the I <br /> City would take this into consideration. <br /> Ms. Alan Pixler for Nancy Levine, 1926 Stowe Avenue, indicated the letter her mother received I <br /> was very confusing. She inquired as to whether a triangular piece of the property was part of the <br /> assessment. Mayor Probst indicated it would be based on the legal description. I <br /> Ms. Pixler indicated it is odd shaped double lot and she inquired if200 feet is appropriate. Mayor <br /> Probst indicated if it is a double lot, potentially 200 feet would be appropriate. I <br /> Mr. Stonehouse verified the triangular portion of the parcel is within the right of way and would not <br /> be assessed. I <br /> Ms. Pixler indicated her mother is recently widowed, she inquired as to who to speak with regarding <br /> an appeal application based on recent deaths. Mayor Probst indicated she would contact City "'- <br /> Administrator Brian F ritsinger. <br /> Ms. Pixler indicated she would like to have seen more notice of the Hearing and the language of the I <br /> notice easier to read. Councilmember Malone indicated because of State requirements, the City must <br /> send a legal document to notify residents of the Public Hearing. He noted at the Public Hearing <br /> itself, staff and Council are able to explain the details of the project. I <br /> Ms. Jolene Sazma, 1909 Stowe Avenue, indicated at a previous meeting a Councilmember stated I <br /> the residents do not pay enough taxes for what is received. Ms. Sazma indicated she was offended <br /> by that statement. <br /> Ms. Sazma indicated she has been aware of the improvements to Stowe Avenue, since April of I <br /> 1994. First, she heard about improvements by the County and now by the City, yet nothing has been <br /> done, and only now the residents are being assessed for the improvements. I <br /> Ms. Sazma expressed concern for paying taxes plus interest for improvements that should have been <br /> done long ago. She indicated she would like justification as to the assessments and why the citizens I <br /> do not pay enough. She also indicated she would like to review the accounts of the City. <br /> Ms. Sazma indicated she did not feel comfortable with the City charging interest on the taxes, she I <br /> felt the City was trying to act like a credit card company. <br /> .1 <br /> I <br /> -- - - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.