Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . ... . <br /> Financina .. <br /> Neighbors Concerns: . <br /> No cost figures, budget or phasing or priority schedules have been presented to . <br /> the hearing. Is the whole proposal an indivisible package. all of the highest <br /> priority? <br /> The money for the project was said to be "earmarked." What does that mean? . <br /> Is league play the "money maker" that pays for all the other programs and drives <br /> this proposal? I <br /> Should we save these funds for acquisition costs and recreational <br /> improvements at the Arsenal site? I <br /> TRM Comments: In the past we have been very careful to preserve our <br /> dedicated funds - rarely drawing down parks funds. This proposal is surely the . <br /> biggest parks capital improvement project ever considered_ ("Initially thought to <br /> cost $450,000" said the Focus story 4/11/95) All be spent in one place_ Has this <br /> bold departure been adequately considered? I <br /> Suggestions: <br /> Some parts of the proposal are necessary and ti mely - -. <br /> Erosion control on the east bank <br /> Securing the trail on the east bank I <br /> Improving drainage in Field #4 behind 2nd base <br /> Moving and upgrading the play area and equipment <br /> Other project components should be delayed for further study- I <br /> New field layout adversely afiects the neighbors I <br /> New field layout provides smaller fields <br /> Parking plan does not add capacity <br /> Lighting plan and adding 200 games should have more study '. <br /> . <br /> . <br /> I <br /> -. <br /> . <br /> _n___ <br />