CCP 08-14-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUL Y 31,1995 5 I Mayor Probst indicated there are several options the Council could choose: I) approve assessment roll with no change; 2) correct assessment with comer lot formula; or 3) table the item. I Councilmember Aplikowski indicated she felt uncomfortable with making a decision at this point. I MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Keim seconded a motion to table the adoption of Resolution 95-57 until August 14, 1995 and direct staff to review options for the assessment roll. I Councilmember Keim inquired as to the information Council wishes to have staff obtain. Councilmember Aplikowski indicated she wished for staff to review configurations of formulas I available and establish what may be the best way in which to assess this unique development. Councilmember Aplikowski indicated it is not just the money issue, but there will be a precedent established. I Motion carried (2-1, with Councilmember Keirn opposed). . Mayor Probst indicated this would be a continued item and there will be no additional publication of the Public Hearing. .e Mr. Getty inquired as to when the 30 day period for appeals would begin. Mr. Filla indicated the written objection would need to be presented to the City prior to the close of the Public Hearing and I then the resident would have 30 days from the time of the adoption of the Assessment Roll by the City Council. I Mr. Harkness inquired if the letter sent to the City would be a formal objection. Mr. Fritsinger indicated typically each homeowner would need to formally object. . Mr. Filla after reviewing the letter of July II, 1995, indicated this would not be a formal objection. Mr. Porter inquired if there is a way to preserve the options of appeals by continuing the Public . Hearing. Mr. Filla indicated if the City Council made a motion, this would be possible. MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Keim seconded a motion to reopen the Public Hearing for I 1995 Street Maintenance Improvement Project. Motion carried unanimously (3-0). Mr. Fritsinger asked if the letters of objection need to be filed before the close of the Public Hearing. I Mr. Filla indicated that was correct and any objections must be made in writing to the City prior to the close of the Public Hearing. . MOTION: Keirn moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to continue the Public Hearing on .e 1995 Street Maintenance Improvement Project to the August 14, 1995 Regular Council Meeting at 8:00 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (3-0). I